Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Protocol Buffers VS Stonebranch

Compare Protocol Buffers VS Stonebranch and see what are their differences

Protocol Buffers logo Protocol Buffers

A method for serializing and interchanging structured data.

Stonebranch logo Stonebranch

Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.
  • Protocol Buffers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • Stonebranch Landing Page
    Landing Page //
    2024-01-22
  • Stonebranch Drag-and-Drop Workflow
    Drag-and-Drop Workflow //
    2024-01-22
  • Stonebranch Integrated Dashboard
    Integrated Dashboard //
    2024-01-22

No matter the degree of automation, the Stonebranch platform is simple, modern, and secure. Using the Stonebranch Universal Automation Center, enterprises can seamlessly orchestrate workloads and data across technology ecosystems and silos. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with points of contact and support across the globe Stonebranch serves some of the world's largest financial, manufacturing, healthcare, travel, transportation, energy, and technology institutions. Learn more: www.stonebranch.com

Protocol Buffers features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Stonebranch features and specs

  • Workload Automation: Job scheduling and Workload Automation capabilities that support on-prem, cloud and containerized microservices in a hybrid IT enviornment.
  • Data Pipeline Orchestration: Simplify the management of your data pipeline with a centralized orchestration solution built to keep data moving—so that insights are delivered to the business without error.
  • Cloud Automation: Centralize the management of automated workloads across private cloud, public cloud, and multi-cloud environment.
  • Managed File Transfer: Move data between any type of cloud, on-prem or containerized system.
  • DevOps and DataOps Enabled: Support dev, test, prod processes within the platorm, or by connecting to third party repositories like GitHub.
  • SaaS: Deployment options include both SaaS and on-premises.

Protocol Buffers videos

Protocol Buffers- A Banked Journey - Christopher Reeves

More videos:

  • Review - justforfunc #30: The Basics of Protocol Buffers
  • Review - Complete Introduction to Protocol Buffers 3 : How are Protocol Buffers used?

Stonebranch videos

Stonebranch's Service Orchestration and Automation Platform (SOAP)

More videos:

  • Review - About the Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Platform

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Protocol Buffers and Stonebranch)
Mobile Apps
100 100%
0% 0
IT Automation
0 0%
100% 100
Configuration Management
100 100%
0% 0
Workflow Automation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Protocol Buffers and Stonebranch. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Protocol Buffers and Stonebranch

Protocol Buffers Reviews

We have no reviews of Protocol Buffers yet.
Be the first one to post

Stonebranch Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
However, choosing a workload automation solution that fits your business goals and objectives in a complex market landscape can be challenging. For instance, Control-M is one of the WLA market leaders along with ActiveBatch, Redwood RunMyJobs, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center (UAC) and JAMS WLA according to AIMultiple’s analysis based on 7 different data sources.
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Stonebranch helps organizations of any size scale and complexity scale up or down as needed. In addition to providing scalable IT automation, Stonebranch simplifies complex IT environments with its platform-agnostic, cloud-based architecture. Customers can benefit from a smoother transition to the cloud without sacrificing security, flexibility, or data security. Regardless...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
With Stonebranch, organizations can centrally manage and automate complex business processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. UAC is designed to simplify IT automation and make it more accessible to business users while still providing advanced features for IT operations teams.
Source: www.redwood.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protocol Buffers seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Protocol Buffers mentions (16)

  • Reducing flyxc data usage
    Flyxc messages are based on protocol buffers ("protobuf" if you want to sound cool). They are not human readable but much more compact and faster for computers to work with:. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
  • Did OpenTelemetry deliver on its promise in 2023?
    > Aren’t a standard You mean like an IETF standard? That is true, although the specification is quite simple to implement. It is certainly a de-facto standard, even if it hasn’t been standardized by the IETF or IEEE or ANSI or ECMA. > inherently limits anything built on top of them to not be a standard either I’m not sure that strictly follows. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9232 for example directly... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • How to Keep a History of MQTT Data With Node.js
    The MQTT protocol is widely used in IoT applications because of its simplicity and ability to connect different data sources to applications using a publish/subscribe model. While many MQTT brokers support persistent sessions and can store message history as long as an MQTT client is not available, there may be cases where data needs to be stored for a longer period. In such cases, it is recommended to use a time... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Dive into Mocking Your Microservice Dependencies with Skyramp
    Generate a mock from an API definition Skyramp simplifies the process of mocking by allowing you to generate mocks directly from your API definitions, such as OpenAPI or Protobuf. This means you can easily create realistic mocks that mimic the behavior of your actual microservices. With the Skyramp CLI, it's as easy as running skyramp mocker generate ... With the relevant inputs. See the Skyramp Docs for which... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Introducing Persisted Copilot Chats - Integrated AI Across your Workflow
    Tsavo also touched upon how consistency is also crucial at the SDK level and the data layer. A fun fact about our company is that a majority of our client-side SDKs are generated off of protobuf specs or HTTP open API specs. This means that when a new endpoint with a certain capability is released, we can quickly have it available in Kotlin, TypeScript, Dart, Rust, Go, and some other languages. This rapid... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

Stonebranch mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Stonebranch yet. Tracking of Stonebranch recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Protocol Buffers and Stonebranch, you can also consider the following products

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Eno - Fast, human readable, plain-text data format

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.