Efficiency
Protocol Buffers are designed to be compact and efficient, using less space compared to other serialization formats like XML or JSON. This efficiency benefits both storage and network transmission.
Backward and Forward Compatibility
Protocol Buffers support easy schema evolution. New fields can be added to your protocol without breaking existing deployed programs that are compiled with an older version of the protocol.
Performance
They offer fast serialization and deserialization, which can significantly improve performance in applications where speed is critical.
Language Support
Protocol Buffers are supported in multiple programming languages, making them flexible for use in diverse tech stacks and across different systems.
Type Safety
With Protocol Buffers, schemas are strictly defined, which provides a level of type safety compared to text-based formats like JSON or XML.
Promote Protocol Buffers. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Protocol Buffers is good.
Check the traffic stats of Protocol Buffers on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Protocol Buffers on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Protocol Buffers's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Protocol Buffers on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Protocol Buffers on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Instead of JSON, all responses use Protocol Buffers (protobuf). Why? Smaller payloads, lower bandwidth costs, helps keep the project within free-tier hosting limits (although it's a veery generous 10TB/monthly). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
First, we need to define our data model and API endpoints using Protocol Buffers. They are an industry standard when it comes to low-latency, high-performance data serialization. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
A schema.json converter for easier ingestion (likely supporting Avro and Protobuf). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Protocol Buffers Documentation Protobuf Json JSON in API Development. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
For our luck, Go is one of the 11 languages with official libraries. It is important to say that the framework uses Protocol Buffer to serialize the message. The first step then is to install locally the protobuf and its Go plugins:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Note: Clients and services will ignore field numbers they do not recognize. For more details about Protobuf, visit protobuf.dev. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Protobuf (Protocol Buffers), created by Google, is, according to the official website :. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
You will notice the code above prints out an array of numbers that only mean something to you if you are an all-knowing AI. These numbers are generated using Google's Protocol Buffers (also refered to as protobuf). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
The compact nature of VelocyPack also benefits data transmission over networks. Smaller data sizes mean less bandwidth usage and faster transmission times, essential for distributed databases and applications that rely on real-time data. Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) by Google is another binary format with similar advantages; VelocyPack's integration with ArangoDB offers seamless usage within this specific database... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Flyxc messages are based on protocol buffers ("protobuf" if you want to sound cool). They are not human readable but much more compact and faster for computers to work with:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
> Arenโt a standard You mean like an IETF standard? That is true, although the specification is quite simple to implement. It is certainly a de-facto standard, even if it hasnโt been standardized by the IETF or IEEE or ANSI or ECMA. > inherently limits anything built on top of them to not be a standard either Iโm not sure that strictly follows. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9232 for example directly... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
The MQTT protocol is widely used in IoT applications because of its simplicity and ability to connect different data sources to applications using a publish/subscribe model. While many MQTT brokers support persistent sessions and can store message history as long as an MQTT client is not available, there may be cases where data needs to be stored for a longer period. In such cases, it is recommended to use a time... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Generate a mock from an API definition Skyramp simplifies the process of mocking by allowing you to generate mocks directly from your API definitions, such as OpenAPI or Protobuf. This means you can easily create realistic mocks that mimic the behavior of your actual microservices. With the Skyramp CLI, it's as easy as running skyramp mocker generate ... With the relevant inputs. See the Skyramp Docs for which... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Tsavo also touched upon how consistency is also crucial at the SDK level and the data layer. A fun fact about our company is that a majority of our client-side SDKs are generated off of protobuf specs or HTTP open API specs. This means that when a new endpoint with a certain capability is released, we can quickly have it available in Kotlin, TypeScript, Dart, Rust, Go, and some other languages. This rapid... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
This is a bit similar to roll your own crypto conversation. It is fun, and a great way to learn. And once done, you should do well to never deploy your own crypto in any real life application. Friends don't let friends roll their own protocol over UDP (or IP; I mean why not?). There are very few apps that have such an explicit requirements that they can't do away with TLS over any number of existing, and well... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Time to explore protobuf with code! I'll start by trying to share a message between an OCaml and a Python application. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
High Performance: gRPC utilizes Protocol Buffers, a data format for serializing structured data, which helps efficiently package and send data. Using the gRPC framework, data is transferred at high-speed thanks to the utilization of the HTTP/2 protocol. This combination of efficiency and speed in data communication leads to high-performance applications. Grpc also ensures high bidirectional streaming performance,... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Cons*: Uses protocol buffers for serialization instead of JSON or XML. Might not be as familiar for integrators as REST.โ. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Not much. You can check the source code in https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf. For example, for serializing a boolean in C#: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WritingPrimitives.cs#L165. Strings and objects are a bit more complicated, but it is all about turning the data into its byte representation. Source: about 2 years ago
One of the key feature of gRPC is protobuf .proto file(nothing but just a contract for me between two communicator code components) This file and protobuff compiler is so mature, then it generates a direct client implementation using protoccompiler. ref. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Creating a protocol, Think about https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf essentially creating a possible protocol in an already existing market (that of serialization tech). That was only possible through #OpenSource as integrations in all kinds of programming languages had to be created. Source: over 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Protocol Buffers to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Protocol Buffers good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Protocol Buffers here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.