Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache Oozie VS IBM Workload Automation

Compare Apache Oozie VS IBM Workload Automation and see what are their differences

Apache Oozie logo Apache Oozie

Apache Oozie Workflow Scheduler for Hadoop

IBM Workload Automation logo IBM Workload Automation

IBM Workload Automation helps increase productivity and governance of enterprise business workloads with hybrid automation and applied analytics.
  • Apache Oozie Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25
  • IBM Workload Automation Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-28

Apache Oozie videos

Migrating Apache Oozie Workflows to Apache Airflow

More videos:

  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager
  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager

IBM Workload Automation videos

IBM Workload Automation Roadmap and Strategy Update

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Oozie and IBM Workload Automation)
Workflow Automation
54 54%
46% 46
IT Automation
46 46%
54% 54
Workload Automation
48 48%
52% 52
Product Deployment
32 32%
68% 68

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Oozie and IBM Workload Automation. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Oozie and IBM Workload Automation

Apache Oozie Reviews

10 Best Airflow Alternatives for 2024
One of the workflow scheduler services/applications operating on the Hadoop cluster is Apache Oozie. It is used to handle Hadoop tasks such as Hive, Sqoop, SQL, MapReduce, and HDFS operations such as distcp. It is a system that manages the workflow of jobs that are reliant on each other. Users can design Directed Acyclic Graphs of processes here, which can be performed in...
Source: hevodata.com

IBM Workload Automation Reviews

9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: IBM Workload Automation has been designed to simplify business, operational, and IT workflows. It is also capable of orchestrating event-driven and unattended workloads. Its user-friendly interface provides graphical views and embedded analytics that allow users to make data-driven decisions.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Oozie seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Oozie mentions (1)

IBM Workload Automation mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Workload Automation yet. Tracking of IBM Workload Automation recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Oozie and IBM Workload Automation, you can also consider the following products

Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

Apache Ambari - Ambari is aimed at making Hadoop management simpler by developing software for provisioning, managing, and monitoring Hadoop clusters.

CA Workload Automation CA7 - CA Workload Automation CA 7