Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS Apache Oozie

Compare Control-M VS Apache Oozie and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Apache Oozie logo Apache Oozie

Apache Oozie Workflow Scheduler for Hadoop
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Apache Oozie Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25

Control-M features and specs

  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling
    Control-M provides an extensive range of job scheduling capabilities, supporting various environments and platforms, which ensures that all workflows and batch jobs can be managed consistently and efficiently.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for both technical and non-technical users to manage job workflows without extensive training.
  • Scalability
    Control-M scales effortlessly, accommodating the needs of small businesses to large enterprises, without compromising on performance.
  • Integrations
    It seamlessly integrates with numerous applications and technologies, including cloud services, databases, ERP systems, and more, which makes it versatile across different IT landscapes.
  • Advanced Automation Features
    Provides advanced automation capabilities such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and DR capabilities that enhance efficiency and reduce manual intervention.
  • Robust Reporting
    Offers powerful reporting tools and dashboards that provide actionable insights and visibility into job performance and system health.

Possible disadvantages of Control-M

  • Cost
    The comprehensive features and enterprise-level capabilities come at a high cost, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial installation and configuration can be complex and require significant investment in time and resources to set up properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the depth and breadth of features can result in a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating substantial training.
  • Resource Intensive
    Control-M can be resource-intensive, requiring considerable computing resources to run efficiently, which might be a constraint for organizations with limited IT infrastructure.
  • Dependency on Vendor Support
    While support is robust, the complexity of the system can sometimes necessitate frequent interaction with vendor support, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While the tool is highly configurable, extensive customization can become complicated and may require professional services or advanced knowledge.

Apache Oozie features and specs

  • Integration
    Apache Oozie is well-integrated with the Hadoop ecosystem, allowing it to schedule jobs across various components like Hive, Pig, Sqoop, and MapReduce. This makes it highly beneficial for users working in Hadoop environments.
  • Flexibility
    Oozie supports various job types and offers workflow orchestration capabilities which go beyond simple job scheduling, including decision paths, sub-workflows, and the ability to execute arbitrary shell scripts.
  • Extensibility
    It is highly extensible, allowing users to add custom action nodes in workflows. This extends its functionality beyond built-in support, accommodating more complex data processing needs.
  • Dependency Management
    Oozie provides ways to manage job dependencies, which is crucial for executing data pipelines where the output of one job may serve as the input for another.
  • Time and Event-based Triggering
    It supports both time-based and event-based triggering of workflows, which provides flexibility in how and when workflows are initiated according to specific business requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Oozie

  • Complexity
    Oozie's configuration and operation can be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for newcomers, especially those unfamiliar with XML-based configuration.
  • Limited User Interface
    Compared to other modern workflow scheduling tools, Oozie's UI is considered less intuitive and user-friendly, making it more challenging for users to manage and monitor workflows.
  • Scalability Issues
    For large-scale data processing, Oozie may face performance bottlenecks and scalability issues, especially when dealing with a vast number of concurrent workflows.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Oozie lacks some advanced features offered by newer workflow management tools, such as easy integration with modern DevOps practices, advanced failure handling, and sophisticated monitoring capabilities.
  • Resource Management
    Oozie does not offer built-in resource management, relying heavily on external tools and configurations to manage resources effectively, which can complicate workflow setups in resource-constrained environments.

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Apache Oozie videos

Migrating Apache Oozie Workflows to Apache Airflow

More videos:

  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager
  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and Apache Oozie)
IT Automation
74 74%
26% 26
Workflow Automation
69 69%
31% 31
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Product Deployment
66 66%
34% 34

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and Apache Oozie. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and Apache Oozie

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Apache Oozie Reviews

10 Best Airflow Alternatives for 2024
One of the workflow scheduler services/applications operating on the Hadoop cluster is Apache Oozie. It is used to handle Hadoop tasks such as Hive, Sqoop, SQL, MapReduce, and HDFS operations such as distcp. It is a system that manages the workflow of jobs that are reliant on each other. Users can design Directed Acyclic Graphs of processes here, which can be performed in...
Source: hevodata.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Oozie seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Control-M mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Control-M yet. Tracking of Control-M recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Oozie mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and Apache Oozie, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.