Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Stonebranch VS Apache Oozie

Compare Stonebranch VS Apache Oozie and see what are their differences

SysAid
SysAid is a robust IT Service Management (ITSM) platform powered by Agentic AI, automating the repetitive, time-consuming work. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Stonebranch logo Stonebranch

Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Apache Oozie logo Apache Oozie

Apache Oozie Workflow Scheduler for Hadoop
  • Stonebranch Landing Page as of 10-30-24
    Landing Page as of 10-30-24 //
    2024-10-30
  • Stonebranch Drag-and-Drop Workflow
    Drag-and-Drop Workflow //
    2024-01-22
  • Stonebranch Integrated Dashboard
    Integrated Dashboard //
    2024-01-22

No matter the degree of automation, the Stonebranch platform is simple, modern, and secure. Using the Stonebranch Universal Automation Center, enterprises can seamlessly orchestrate workloads and data across technology ecosystems and silos. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with points of contact and support across the globe Stonebranch serves some of the world's largest financial, manufacturing, healthcare, travel, transportation, energy, and technology institutions. Learn more: www.stonebranch.com

  • Apache Oozie Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25

Stonebranch features and specs

  • Workload Automation
    Job scheduling and Workload Automation capabilities that support on-prem, cloud and containerized microservices in a hybrid IT enviornment.
  • Data Pipeline Orchestration
    Simplify the management of your data pipeline with a centralized orchestration solution built to keep data moving—so that insights are delivered to the business without error.
  • Cloud Automation
    Centralize the management of automated workloads across private cloud, public cloud, and multi-cloud environment.
  • Managed File Transfer
    Move data between any type of cloud, on-prem or containerized system.
  • DevOps and DataOps Enabled
    Support dev, test, prod processes within the platorm, or by connecting to third party repositories like GitHub.
  • SaaS
    Deployment options include both SaaS and on-premises.

Apache Oozie features and specs

  • Integration
    Apache Oozie is well-integrated with the Hadoop ecosystem, allowing it to schedule jobs across various components like Hive, Pig, Sqoop, and MapReduce. This makes it highly beneficial for users working in Hadoop environments.
  • Flexibility
    Oozie supports various job types and offers workflow orchestration capabilities which go beyond simple job scheduling, including decision paths, sub-workflows, and the ability to execute arbitrary shell scripts.
  • Extensibility
    It is highly extensible, allowing users to add custom action nodes in workflows. This extends its functionality beyond built-in support, accommodating more complex data processing needs.
  • Dependency Management
    Oozie provides ways to manage job dependencies, which is crucial for executing data pipelines where the output of one job may serve as the input for another.
  • Time and Event-based Triggering
    It supports both time-based and event-based triggering of workflows, which provides flexibility in how and when workflows are initiated according to specific business requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Oozie

  • Complexity
    Oozie's configuration and operation can be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for newcomers, especially those unfamiliar with XML-based configuration.
  • Limited User Interface
    Compared to other modern workflow scheduling tools, Oozie's UI is considered less intuitive and user-friendly, making it more challenging for users to manage and monitor workflows.
  • Scalability Issues
    For large-scale data processing, Oozie may face performance bottlenecks and scalability issues, especially when dealing with a vast number of concurrent workflows.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Oozie lacks some advanced features offered by newer workflow management tools, such as easy integration with modern DevOps practices, advanced failure handling, and sophisticated monitoring capabilities.
  • Resource Management
    Oozie does not offer built-in resource management, relying heavily on external tools and configurations to manage resources effectively, which can complicate workflow setups in resource-constrained environments.

Stonebranch videos

+ Add

Stonebranch's Service Orchestration and Automation Platform (SOAP)

More videos:

  • Review - About the Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Platform

Apache Oozie videos

+ Add

Migrating Apache Oozie Workflows to Apache Airflow

More videos:

  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager
  • Review - Breathing New Life into Apache Oozie with Apache Ambari Workflow Manager

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Stonebranch and Apache Oozie)

Stonebranch

Apache Oozie

IT Automation
65 65%
IT Automation
35% 35
Workflow Automation
63 63%
Workflow Automation
37% 37
Workload Automation
66 66%
Workload Automation
34% 34
Product Deployment
0 0%
Product Deployment
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Stonebranch and Apache Oozie. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Stonebranch and Apache Oozie

Stonebranch Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
However, choosing a workload automation solution that fits your business goals and objectives in a complex market landscape can be challenging. For instance, Control-M is one of the WLA market leaders along with ActiveBatch, Redwood RunMyJobs, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center (UAC) and JAMS WLA according to AIMultiple’s analysis based on 7 different data sources.
Source: research.aimultiple.com
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Stonebranch helps organizations of any size scale and complexity scale up or down as needed. In addition to providing scalable IT automation, Stonebranch simplifies complex IT environments with its platform-agnostic, cloud-based architecture. Customers can benefit from a smoother transition to the cloud without sacrificing security, flexibility, or data security. Regardless...
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
With Stonebranch, organizations can centrally manage and automate complex business processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. UAC is designed to simplify IT automation and make it more accessible to business users while still providing advanced features for IT operations teams.
Source: www.redwood.com

Apache Oozie Reviews

10 Best Airflow Alternatives for 2024
One of the workflow scheduler services/applications operating on the Hadoop cluster is Apache Oozie. It is used to handle Hadoop tasks such as Hive, Sqoop, SQL, MapReduce, and HDFS operations such as distcp. It is a system that manages the workflow of jobs that are reliant on each other. Users can design Directed Acyclic Graphs of processes here, which can be performed in...
Source: hevodata.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Oozie seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Stonebranch mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Stonebranch yet. Tracking of Stonebranch recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Oozie mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Stonebranch and Apache Oozie, you can also consider the following products

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.

OpCon - OpCon delivers the power of Enterprise Workload Automation and Orchestration with ease for financial services, retail and other transactional businesses.

Cleo Integration Cloud - Secure Integration and Data Movement Platform

Loading...