Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache CXF VS vibe.d

Compare Apache CXF VS vibe.d and see what are their differences

Apache CXF logo Apache CXF

Apache CXF, Services Framework - Index

vibe.d logo vibe.d

Vibe.d is a declarative REST and web application framework.
  • Apache CXF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-29
  • vibe.d Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-31

Apache CXF features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Service Support
    Apache CXF supports a wide range of web service standards including SOAP, REST, and various WS-* standards, allowing developers to work with different service types under one framework.
  • Flexibility
    CXF is highly configurable and can be customized to meet various needs ranging from simple web APIs to complex enterprise integrations, supporting both XML and JSON formats.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with other Java enterprise standards and frameworks such as Spring and JAX-RS, offering seamless integration into existing systems.
  • Active Community and Documentation
    Being an Apache project, CXF benefits from a large, active community which contributes to extensive documentation, forums, and community support.
  • Performance
    Apache CXF is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which can lead to better performance in web service communication compared to some heavier alternatives.

Possible disadvantages of Apache CXF

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive features and flexibility of Apache CXF can make it complex for beginners to get started, requiring a good understanding of web service concepts and configurations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its wide range of capabilities and configurability, mastering Apache CXF may involve a steep learning curve for developers, especially those new to web services or enterprise integration.
  • Documentation Gaps
    While there is extensive documentation, it can sometimes be outdated or lacking in detailed examples for complex configurations and newer features, which can be challenging for developers needing specific information.
  • Overhead for Simple Use-Cases
    For very simple REST or SOAP web services, Apache CXF may introduce more complexity and overhead than necessary compared to more lightweight alternatives or simpler frameworks.

vibe.d features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache CXF videos

15-Generating Code - SOAP WSDL to Java using Apache CXF Plugin | Maven for Beginners | Code Journal

vibe.d videos

No vibe.d videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache CXF and vibe.d)
Developer Tools
58 58%
42% 42
Web Frameworks
55 55%
45% 45
Ruby Web Framework
61 61%
39% 39
Vector Icons
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache CXF and vibe.d. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache CXF should be more popular than vibe.d. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache CXF mentions (2)

  • It's 2023. Your API should have a schema
    SOAP died because it is awful. There are plenty of java libraries that can generate java code from a WSDL. Apache CXF seem to be the fairly standard library people use. (https://cxf.apache.org). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What’s Coming in Jakarta REST 3.1?
    A few years back, Adam Bien wrote an excellent blog post on how to configure JSON-B in a Jakarta REST application. The only trouble is that at that time, the approach only worked with Eclipse Jersey. Since then other implementations (including Open Liberty via Apache CXF) also enabled this functionality, but it will become a standard in 3.1, enabling more portable usage of JSON-B configuration. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

vibe.d mentions (1)

  • Writing a Jinja-inspired template library in Python
    In D, vibe.d does this. It uses a pug like syntax for templates. https://vibed.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache CXF and vibe.d, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

jQuery UI - Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

Apache Axis2 - Other Web Frameworks

Font Awesome - Font Awesome makes it easy to add vector icons and social logos to your website. And version 5 is redesigned and built from the ground up!

WOW Slider - Responsive jQuery Image Slider, jQuery Slideshow. Stunning visual effects and templates. Drag-n-drop maker - No hand coding!

DataTables - DataTables is a plug-in for the jQuery Javascript library.