Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Cassandra VS Messagepack

Compare Apache Cassandra VS Messagepack and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.

Messagepack logo Messagepack

An efficient binary serialization format.
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17
  • Messagepack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-07

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

Messagepack features and specs

  • Efficiency
    MessagePack provides efficient binary serialization, which can significantly reduce the size of the data. This makes it faster to transmit over networks and cheaper to store, particularly for large datasets.
  • Interoperability
    MessagePack is supported by a wide variety of programming languages, making it easy to use in polyglot environments or in systems that consist of multiple services using different programming languages.
  • Simplicity
    The MessagePack format is simple to use and understand, comparable to JSON, but it offers better performance and compactness as it uses binary format instead of text.
  • Flexibility
    Supports a variety of data types including integers, floats, strings, arrays, and maps, allowing for complex data structures to be serialized without losing any information.

Possible disadvantages of Messagepack

  • Human Readability
    Because MessagePack uses a binary format, it is not human-readable. This makes debugging and logging more difficult compared to text formats like JSON.
  • Size Overhead for Small Data
    For very small payloads, the size overhead of MessagePack can be higher than JSON. This is because the headers and binary format of MessagePack can add more bytes compared to JSON’s minimal text representation.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While MessagePack is widely supported, its ecosystem and tooling are not as rich as JSON’s. JSON has more extensive support in terms of libraries, tools, and online resources.
  • Complexity in Implementation
    Implementing MessagePack serialization and deserialization requires handling binary data, which can be more complex than dealing with text-based formats. This might require more effort and careful handling, especially in resource-constrained environments.

Apache Cassandra videos

+ Add

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Messagepack videos

No Messagepack videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Cassandra and Messagepack)

Apache Cassandra

Messagepack

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Configuration Management
0 0%
Configuration Management
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
NoSQL Databases
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Cassandra and Messagepack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Cassandra and Messagepack

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
Source: www.analytixlabs.co.in
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Messagepack Reviews

We have no reviews of Messagepack yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra should be more popular than Messagepack. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Messagepack mentions (14)

  • ARJSON
    ARJSON leverages bit-level optimizations to encode JSON at lightning speed while compressing data more efficiently than other self-contained JSON encoding/compression algorithms, such as MessagePack and CBOR. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Salt Exporter: the story behind the tool
    I also read that Salt was using MessagePack to format their messages. MessagePack is a format like JSON, but more compact. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • What is the fastest way to encode the arbitrary struct into bytes?
    So appreciate such a detailed reply, thanks. btw, why did you choose tinylib/msgp from 4 available go-impls? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Using Arduino as input to Rust project (help needed)
    If you find you're running the serial connection at maximum speed and it's still not fast enough, try switching to a more compact binary encoding that has both Serde and Arduino implementations, like MsgPack... Though I don't remember enough about its format off the top of my head to tell you the easiest way to put an unambiguous header on each packet/message to make the protocol self-synchronizing. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Java Serialization with Protocol Buffers
    The information can be stored in a database or as files, serialized in a standard format and with a schema agreed with your Data Engineering team. Depending on your information and requirements, it can be as simple as CSV, XML or JSON, or Big Data formats such as Parquet, Avro, ORC, Arrow, or message serialization formats like Protocol Buffers, FlatBuffers, MessagePack, Thrift, or Cap'n Proto. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Cassandra and Messagepack, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Protobuf - Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Avro - Avro Keyboard is an Unicode and ANSI compliant Free Bangla Typing Software and Bangla Spell Checker for Windows.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

Loading...