Amazon Glacier might be a bit more popular than Artifactory. We know about 28 links to it since March 2021 and only 20 links to Artifactory. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Do you think that Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive is good for digital preservation of my ~300GB video stash? Source: 10 months ago
Easy - I know about S3 Glaciers but I'd prefer something that doesn't require going through a number of tutorials to use. Source: about 1 year ago
The nice thing about AWS is that you could use Amazon S3 Glacier storage if you can live with slower retrieval (5-12 hours). It's really cheap and excellent for non-changing requirements which would be good for media that isn't updating regularly. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: about 1 year ago
I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ . You can explicitly upload files there via web interface or many 3rd party clients. You can also upload to more than one geographical location. Source: over 1 year ago
What you want, is Amazon Glacier. You're not talking about Backup here, you're talking about Archival. Source: over 1 year ago
I kind of hate it, but Artifactory seems popular at companies: https://jfrog.com/artifactory/. Source: 11 months ago
When not providing all dependencies yourself, you might suffer from people deleting the packages you depend on (IMHO a very rare scenario). If it is really that critical (hint: usually it isn't), create a local mirror of Pypi (full or only the packages you need). Devpi, Artifactory, etc. Can do that or you just dump the necessary files into Cloud storage, so you have a backup. Source: about 1 year ago
Operate a pull-through cache registry, like Artifactory or the open source reference Docker registry. This will allow you to pull images from Docker Hub less frequently, improving your chances of staying under the anonymous usage limit. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Like suppose for a second that . . . Idk . . . a product team wants our ci workflows to start using Artifactory. Okay great, I don't know Artifactory integration but I'm going to tell them "Sure, I'll get right on that.". Source: about 1 year ago
If these "assets" have an independent release schedule I would treat them separately (especially if they are externally provided). If they are not built from source then treat them as artefacts, they don't belong in git. You can store the in an artefact repository (like Artifactory of Nexus) or (as u/nekokattt points out) in something like S3. Source: over 1 year ago
Azure Archive Storage - Low cost, secure cloud storage for rarely accessed data.
Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.
Mimecast Cloud Archive - Reduce costs with Mimecast's cloud archive to move to the cloud with a single, secure archive for email, files and other content.
Cloudsmith - Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.
Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.
Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.