No Azure Archive Storage videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Artifactory should be more popular than Azure Archive Storage. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I kind of hate it, but Artifactory seems popular at companies: https://jfrog.com/artifactory/. Source: 11 months ago
When not providing all dependencies yourself, you might suffer from people deleting the packages you depend on (IMHO a very rare scenario). If it is really that critical (hint: usually it isn't), create a local mirror of Pypi (full or only the packages you need). Devpi, Artifactory, etc. Can do that or you just dump the necessary files into Cloud storage, so you have a backup. Source: about 1 year ago
Operate a pull-through cache registry, like Artifactory or the open source reference Docker registry. This will allow you to pull images from Docker Hub less frequently, improving your chances of staying under the anonymous usage limit. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Like suppose for a second that . . . Idk . . . a product team wants our ci workflows to start using Artifactory. Okay great, I don't know Artifactory integration but I'm going to tell them "Sure, I'll get right on that.". Source: over 1 year ago
If these "assets" have an independent release schedule I would treat them separately (especially if they are externally provided). If they are not built from source then treat them as artefacts, they don't belong in git. You can store the in an artefact repository (like Artifactory of Nexus) or (as u/nekokattt points out) in something like S3. Source: over 1 year ago
This! Glacier is very cheap and is a great option to store archival data. OP should be aware that it would take a while to retrieve data if needed. As mentioned, Azure Archive Storage is a nice option as well. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/. Source: over 1 year ago
Cheaper than that would be Azure Archive or AWS Glacier since their storage costs $0.00099 per month for 1GB, but it takes a while to retrieve data back. If you need a long-term archival for cheap, their archive storage is worth your considerations. Https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/archive/ Https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/. Source: almost 3 years ago
If you're deploying applications to the cloud, you'll need persistent data storage. Azure Blob Storage allows scalable storage for objects and files and provides an SDK to easily access them. Blob storage is a great trigger for Azure Functions, where uploading a file can automatically run your custom logic in the cloud (for example, if you wanted to run OCR on a file as soon as it's uploaded to a storage... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.
Mimecast Cloud Archive - Reduce costs with Mimecast's cloud archive to move to the cloud with a single, secure archive for email, files and other content.
Cloudsmith - Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.
Amazon Glacier - Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost storage service for data archiving and long-term backup.
Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.
Public Cloud Archive - Learn about cloud archiving, the difference between hybrid and full-service cloud archive offerings, and the key cloud archive vendors and offerings in the market today.