This page is designed to help you find out whether Seaweed FS is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
Scalability
SeaweedFS is designed to handle a large number of small files, making it highly scalable for extensive data storage needs.
High Availability
The system provides high availability through replication of data across different nodes, ensuring redundancy and reliability.
Performance
Optimized for fast performance with its O(1) disk read result, SeaweedFS can efficiently handle numerous file operations.
Cost-Effectiveness
SeaweedFS uses a distributed architecture that utilizes resources efficiently, potentially reducing costs compared to traditional file systems.
Simplicity
The architecture and design of SeaweedFS are simplistic, which makes deployment and management easier to handle for users.
Promote Seaweed FS. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Seaweed FS is good.
Check the traffic stats of Seaweed FS on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Seaweed FS on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Seaweed FS's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Seaweed FS on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Seaweed FS on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Sounds like the lesson learned is using the right tool for the job -- reusing Kubernetes in an existing cluster to spin up sandboxes is a fair initial path to start offering the service. But Kubernetes likely isn't meant for rapid churn of workloads, here sandboxes. The architecture to me seemed very similar to SeaweedFS [1] (Facebook Haystack [2]) except with an extra layer for sandbox-hosting nodes. Like... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
All examples in this guide use an in-cluster SeaweedFS instance as the pgBackRest S3 repository. SeaweedFS is Apache-2.0 licensed, actively maintained, and a clean drop-in replacement for the role MinIO used to fill in this stack. Any other S3-compatible storage works just as well: AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage (via HMAC keys), Ceph RadosGW, Cloudflare R2, and so on. For non-SeaweedFS endpoints, remove... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
How does s4 compare to for example: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs? - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I'm thinking maybe SeaweedFS [0, 2] or Versity Gatweway [1, 3]. Seems there are other options, too: RustFS [4], Garage [5]. I only used MinIO briefly in the past, but plan to set up S3 blob storage again soon. [0] https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs [1] https://github.com/versity/versitygw [2] https://blog.elest.io/rustfs-vs-seaweedfs-vs-garage-which-minio-alternative-should-you-pick/ [3]... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
There is https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs I haver not used it but will be likely a good minion alternative for people who want to run a server and don't use minio just as s3 client. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Do you want to serve already existing files from a directory or just that the backend is a directory on your server? If the answer is the latter, seaweedfs is an option: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs?tab=readme-ov-file#quick-start-with-single-binary. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
I think Minio is the only Go client for S3 API and S3-compatible APIs. I cannot say I liked using it, but I had no choice. Nowadays I run my own file storage with my own API, so I no longer care. But if anyone wants to run their own file storage(so not a client), there is https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs#compared-to-other-file-systems is handy, and I like that they support "sane" metadata stores and don't just do something dumb like make me run etcd. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Iām interested in how it is compared to seaweedfs[1], which we use for storing weather data (about 3 PB) for ML training. [1] https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs?tab=readme-ov-file#quick-start-seaweedfs-s3-on-aws https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/wiki/Cloud-Tier https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/wiki/Words-from-SeaweedFS-Users ...your true issue is it seems like you're using the filesystem as the "only" storage layer in play, but you also need time and entity querying(!?!). >> we need to be able to query on a per sensor... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
> Just have them upload blobs to S3 or Azure Storage. Not everyone can store their data in cloud services, most likely. That said, S3 compatible solutions like MinIO might be a good choice: https://github.com/minio/minio. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
> When it gets too out of hand, people will paper it over with a new, simpler abstraction layer, and the process starts again, only with a layer of garbage spaghetti underneath. I'm pretty happy that there are S3 compatible stores that you can host yourself, that aren't insanely complex. MinIO: https://min.io/ SeaweedFS: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs Of course, many will prefer hosted/managed solutions... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
What distributed file system would you use for a greenfield homelab project today? Requirements / desires: * Reliable * Performant * Easy to setup and operate Some options: SeaweedFS - https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs 289 hits: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=seaweedfs&sort=byPopularity&type=all JuiceFS - https://github.com/juicedata/juicefs 2047 hits:... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
> Theoretically they could swap with minio but last time we used it it was not a drop-in replacement yet. Depends on whether AGPL v3 works for you or not (or whether you decide to pay them), I guess: https://min.io/pricing I've actually been looking for more open alternatives, but haven't found much. Zenko CloudServer seemed to be somewhat promising, but doesn't seem to be managed very actively:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Wireguard + GUI: https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy Backups of mail accounts: https://www.offlineimap.org Cloud storage for phones: http://nextcloud.com Mirroring podcasts locally: https://github.com/akhilrex/podgrab My own matrix instance: https://matrix-org.github.io/dendrite/ Backups: https://restic.net Media Management: https://jellyfin.org Relay only tor help: https://www.torproject.org S3 compatible storage:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
JuiceFS is mostly POSIX compatible, but there are important caveats to that like no ACL, copying files changes their mtime (which impacts backup tools), has "close-to-open" consistency (which makes it dangerous for log appenders). Choosing an appropriate solution in this space still depends on what you need to do with the storage, and some options are MooseFS https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs, Curve... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Supabase-Storage uses an S3 compatible API and is ultimately just middleware for it. So, the redundancy would be at the storage backend systems. Seems like the majority of s3 compatible selfhosted systems are built for redundancy/high-availability. With only a brief read of docs, and in no particular order: Https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/quick-start/ Https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs CEPH... Source: over 3 years ago
Adopted SeaweedFS few months back. Never looked back since then. It's fast even on HDD disks. https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs#introduction. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Suprised to see that nobody has mentioned SeaweedFS so far. Source: over 3 years ago
Did you pull that URL out of some blog post or something? The accurate URL is https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Garage design goals and non-goals: https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/design/goals/ Seaweed design goals / features: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs MinIO: https://min.io/docs/minio/linux/operations/concepts.html Note Garage lists as non goals specify priority features of Seaweed or MinIO, for example erasure coding. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Seaweed FS to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Seaweed FS good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Seaweed FS here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.