Reflect is a tool that helps you test any website without writing any code. All you need to create a test is a URL. Our cloud-based browser allows you to interact with your website just like a normal browser. Behind the scenes, Reflect captures all of your actions and builds a repeatable test script. When you're finished, you can run that test script whenever you want within our automated platform. So, if you can use your site, you can test your site.
Reflect supports nearly all browser interactions out-of-the-box, including hovers and drag-and-drops. It offers visual assertions for ensuring the appearance of your webapp, and includes test editing functionality and API access.
Easy to Set-up and use
Clean UI
Free Trial
Cross-platform
Promote Reflect.run. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Playwright is good but there is also other kind of tools like https://reflect.run/ and https://ghostinspector.com/ that are perfect for end user testing. Hope it helps. Source: about 2 years ago
Is it possible to personalize your pitches to individual users? At our startup [1] we try to get straight to point when pitching the product and demo something that is as close as possible to how the person we're talking to would actually use the product. For example, here's a video I just recorded a few minutes ago for someone that I've been talking to via email:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I've definitely had reflect.run on my radar, and agreed on the expensive AF part, mind if I reach out for your thoughts on what lead you/your team down to reflect.run and your experience with it so far? 😄. Source: about 3 years ago
Checkout reflect.run we just started using it. Expensive AF but pretty nice. Source: about 3 years ago
Yes definitely, there's lots of products in the QA space trying to tackle the problem you're describing. I'm a co-founder of a no-code product in the space (https://reflect.run). Being no-code has the advantage of enabling all QA testers to build test automation, regardless of coding experience. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Reflect | Software Engineer | Philadelphia, PA (onsite) | Full-time | https://reflect.run Reflect (https://reflect.run) is a no-code testing platform for web applications. Developers and QA testers use Reflect to create end-to-end tests for their web apps, and we let them do it 10x-100x faster than traditional code-based tools. At Reflect, our goal is simple: to be the best platform for end-to-end testing web... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I do think it's a major shift but not in a mutually exclusive way, and maybe not a "paradigm" shift. I think initially, no-code tools were touted as being for non-developers. But now there is a realization that no-code tools are more like "automation" for completing a task. In that mindset, anyone (developer or not) can benefit from using them since it can be/should be/is more efficient. To the extent that... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
We're trying reflect.run for testing but we can't seem to pull up our site on reflect. Source: over 3 years ago
Reflect | Software Engineer | Onsite | Philadelphia, PA | Full-time | https://reflect.run Reflect (https://reflect.run) is a no-code testing platform for web applications. Developers and QA testers use Reflect to create end-to-end tests for their web apps, and we let them do it 10x-100x faster than traditional code-based tools. At Reflect, our goal is simple: to be the best platform for end-to-end testing web... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I used these search terms "reflect no code" and the first hit was https://reflect.run :) https://www.google.com/search?q=reflect+no+code. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
We're a no-code platform for testing, if that counts. :) Should work pretty well for testing no-code tools since the same person who builds the no-code application can also write tests for it. Would love to get your feedback if you do try us: https://reflect.run/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I've not managed to use their product myself yet, so this is based on what I do know about them. The major difference is the ability to use the crowd as well as automate; which I believe is unique to Rainforest. Otherwise, the way they automate is outwardly very similar to us. Looking a little deeper, it seems like they _do_ use the DOM pretty heavily (from re watching the video at https://reflect.run). For us,... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Great to see this shift! I’d be curious to hear about the comparison to https://reflect.run — I can imagine that access to the tester community is a piece of that…. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Reflect.run - Codeless automated tests for web apps. Tests can be scheduled in-app or executed from a CI/CD tool. Each test run includes a full video recording along with console and network logs. The free tier includes an unlimited number of saved tests, with 25 test runs per month and up to 3 users. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
This is a poor decision by the company's management. I'd first reverse this decision because I don't think they can afford it. You should first tell management that their expensive and unrealistic expectations (including the zero-detect business model), certainly without matching support for you and the team (hire more skilled team members, resources, understanding, time, accept delays in deliverables, ...) is not... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
It's surprising how poorly supported Shadow DOM is across the major UI testing frameworks. To access a Shadow DOM element you'll typically need to write a JS shim that uses the DOM APIs to get at the element, and then do other tricks to work around things like closed vs. Open shadow roots and handle how event propagation works with shadow DOM. Shameless plug, but we're building a no-code testing framework... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Reflect.run to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Reflect.run. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.