Probabilistic Programming Support
MC Stan provides advanced support for Bayesian inference and probabilistic programming, allowing users to build complex statistical models with ease.
High-Performance Computing
MC Stan is optimized for speed and efficiency, especially in handling large datasets and complex models, leveraging automatic differentiation and efficient sampling algorithms.
Flexibility
The platform offers flexibility in model specification, enabling users to define a wide range of statistical models without being constrained by predefined structures.
Active Community and Support
MC Stan has an active community that offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums to help users troubleshoot and optimize their models.
Integration with Popular Languages
MC Stan can be easily integrated with popular programming languages such as R and Python, making it accessible to a wide range of users familiar with these environments.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if MC Stan is good.
Check the traffic stats of MC Stan on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of MC Stan on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of MC Stan's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of MC Stan on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about MC Stan on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
My approach to problems like this is to write down the proposed model mathematically first, in extreme detail. I find hierarchical form to be the easiest way to break it down piece by piece. Once I have the maths then I turn it into a Stan model. Last step is to use the Stan output to answer the research questions. Source: almost 3 years ago
For instance my first choice in these cases is always a Bayesian inference tool like Stan. In my experience as someone whoโs more of a programmer than mathematician/statistician, Bayesian tools like this make it much easier to not accidentally fool yourself with assumptions, and they can be pretty good at catching statistical mistakes. Source: about 3 years ago
I tend to be most impressed by tools and libraries. The stuff that has most impressed me in my time in ML is stuff like pytorch and Stan, tools that allow expression of a wide variety of statistical (and ML, DL models, if you believe there's a distinction) models and inference from those models. These are the things that have had the largest effect in my own work, not in the sense of just using these tools, but... Source: about 3 years ago
Oh its certainly used in practice. You should look into frameworks like Stan[1] and pyro[2]. I think bayesian models are seen as more explainable so they will be used in industries that value that sort of thing [1] https://mc-stan.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
At this point the only people using such things are the programmers. Think e.g. STAN. https://mc-stan.org/ the rest of us: R, SAS, Excel. Source: about 3 years ago
Before machine learning Iโd strongly recommend using Bayesian modeling like with stan. Thereโs a variety of Bayesian modeling tools but Iโve used that one the most. Source: over 3 years ago
Well it sounds a lot like you are listening to developers talk about coding languages they like for high performance compute. This is not what you want to be spending all your time doing afaik. The more appropriate languages to get into would be the classic Python and R. Julia if you dont give a shit about productionizing your code and https://mc-stan.org/ Stan if you are really locked into bayesian inference and... Source: over 3 years ago
I'd say take a look at Stan (https://mc-stan.org/). Source: over 3 years ago
Even if RStudio & the Tidyverse have mostly been promoting a functional programming style in R, it has full support for OOP (see R6 or R7 for more modern implementations of it). Let's not even mention the excellent Stan ecosystem for Probabilistic programming / Bayesian modeling, or Bioconductor, the biggest repository of bioinformatics packages & tools of any language. Source: over 3 years ago
This sounds like a case for a nonlinear random effects model (without any AR component). I like to fit such models using Stan, via rstan, although it has quite the learning curve. Source: over 3 years ago
After this I plan to do a series on regression in R, with a focus on Bayesian models using stan. Source: over 3 years ago
I guess you could go that route, but I don't think there's much you could do with that other than simulate the draws. That doesn't have nearly the level of structure as something like a STAN model, for instance. Source: almost 4 years ago
However, I am not very familiar with Bayesian statistics or the software used. I looked into OpenBUGS and Stan, which both can be used with R in Linux. However, the syntax seem very complex in comparison to any SEM software I've encountered before. Furthermore, searching for any literature on the subject (articles, examples, documentation, etc.), I can find some on SEM with ordinal data and some on multilevel SEM,... Source: almost 4 years ago
I think thereโs an interface to Stan via MATLAB, but if you can, better to use either R or Python as the help/community for stats is better for those Languages. Source: about 4 years ago
Okay so first off, I recommend that you read [this](https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4) article about "The Bayesian New Statistics", which highlights estimation rather than hypothesis testing from a Bayesian perspective (see Fig. 1, second row, second column). Instead of a t-test, then, we can *estimate the difference* between two groups/variables. If you want to go deeper than JASP etc, I... Source: about 4 years ago
As others have said, R for academia, Python for industry. However, I'd also throw Stan into the mix, along with other PPL frameworks like Tensorflow Probability and Pyro. The latter two will require you to learn Python first, though. Source: about 4 years ago
How does pomp compare to mc-stan? I thought that was the preferred tool these days. https://mc-stan.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
> I wonder if the tricky part is in choosing random vectors? Sampling vectors from multidimensional random distributions is a well studied problem. For example the open source project https://mc-stan.org implemented several (at the time) state of the art methods like Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with the help of Automatic Differentiation. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Probabilistic programming uses computer science techniques to do automated statistical modeling. For example, imagine I have a coin, and I want to discover if it is biased, i.e. If it lands on heads more often than tails. In a probabilistic programming framework, I can express my model as a simple Bernoulli model, `x ~ Bernoulli(p)`, and then automatically estimate the bias parameter `p` given some data (do... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Not a language, but Stan is worth looking into if you are interested in Bayesian modeling. Source: over 4 years ago
This tutorial explains what is probabilistic programming & provides a review of 5 frameworks (PPLs) using an example taken from Chapter 4 of Statistical Rethinking by Dr. Richard McElreath. Frameworks (PPLs) reviewed are - Stan (https://mc-stan.org/) PyMC3 (https://docs.pymc.io/) Tensorflow Probability (https://www.tensorflow.org/probability) Pyro/NumPyro (https://pyro.ai/) Turing.jl... Source: over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing MC Stan to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is MC Stan good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss MC Stan here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.