Which is what docker/podman/containerd use. If you want full system emulation look into LXC/LXD. Source: 11 months ago
LXD is a manager for Linux Containers (LXC), which lets me spin up a kind-of lightweight VM for any distro, instantly. I use it to run proprietary software isolated from the rest of my system (such as Steam); disposable environments for trying stuff out, and running software that doesn't jive well with Nixos. Source: 12 months ago
Check this thread on linuxcontainers LXD forum. Half way down Simos points to the eventual solution:. Source: about 1 year ago
I found this website https://linuxcontainers.org/ and I am going to test that out for server just to see how it works. Source: about 1 year ago
Up to now the best documentation I have come across is the official one at linuxcontainers.org. Source: about 1 year ago
After five years managing physical servers, then another four years working with VM clusters, the value of Linux Containers(LXC) and their eventual productization as Docker appealed to me. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Docker introduced container images to the technology world, making container images a standardized delivery unit. In fact, before Docker, containerization technology already existed. Let's talk about a more recent technology, LXC (Linux Containers) in 2008. Compared to Docker, LXC is less popular since Docker provides container images, which can be more standardized and more convenient to migrate. Also, Docker... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
They might both be the same as the Canonical/Microcloud writeup references the work to Stephane Graber who also posted the linuxcontainers.org forum message about LXD microceph. Source: over 1 year ago
Linux containers (LXC) are the native containers available in Proxmox. These are quite a bit different than Docker containers. They behave and are managed more like "systems" with their own host name, IP address, shell, etc. TurnKey Linux builds and maintains a number of LXC templates that can be downloaded and installed for free. Source: over 1 year ago
- It's not clear to me yet if I need containers...if so I'm looking at linuxcontainers (linuxcontainers.org). Source: over 1 year ago
Linuxcontainers.org does a pretty good job of describing the options. Source: over 1 year ago
Learn more about Linux containers and LXD/LXC here: linuxcontainers.org. Source: over 1 year ago
If you do want more of a VM-like experience, there are also Linux containers which basically have the full distro experience. (I run PiHole this way (on a rpi4) with an Ethernet bridge for its own IP.). Source: over 1 year ago
Don't use Docker. Use LXD. Less overhead and easier to setup and manage. https://linuxcontainers.org. Source: over 1 year ago
If you need to have containers, skip docker. Load Ubuntu and then use LXD, which has much lower overhead. Learn more here: https://linuxcontainers.org. Source: almost 2 years ago
If you read "rules" to the right you will notice that this sub-reddit is not supposed to be a "support" forum and points you to the linuxcontainers.org user forum to ask support type questions. Source: almost 2 years ago
Linux container provides containers and virtual machines that run full Linux systems. While VMs supply a complete environment, system containers offer an environment as close as possible to the one you'd get from a VM, but without the overhead that comes with running a separate kernel and simulating all the hardware. link. Source: about 2 years ago
I moved my server, router and laptop to Fedora 34. The server is a DNS, database, mail and web server with several applications in LXC containers. I moved most containers to Fedora too but I kept two Ubuntu containers with GitLab. The upgrade to Fedora 35 worked without problems. I was positively surprised. Source: about 2 years ago
Sandboxing process to replace IO with IO of another computer - like this. Source: about 2 years ago
If you're a Linux user, you'd probably point your attention to LXC[0]. Just a few commands to bring up shiny new environment based on a distro selected from wide variety of available options, running on the host kernel with no excessive emulation overhead. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
> They claim that "standard containers" cannot run a full OS. ... This works just fine with rootless podman and, more recently, rootless docker. > Anyone who wants unprivileged system containers might want to look into rootless docker or podman rather than this. Perhaps I'm missing something, but I have been running full OS userlands using "standard containers" in production for years, via LXD[1]. [1]:... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing LXC to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about LXC. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.