Table of contents
Privacy-Focused
LibreWolf is designed with privacy in mind, removing telemetry and tracking features found in standard Firefox releases.
Open Source
Being an open-source project, it ensures transparency and the ability for the community to inspect and contribute to the codebase.
Customizable
LibreWolf allows extensive customization, enabling users to modify settings according to their specific privacy and usability preferences.
Enhanced Security
Additional security features such as hardened settings, built-in uBlock Origin, and strict firewall rules provide a more secure browsing experience.
Ad and Tracker Blocking
By default, LibreWolf includes tools to block ads and trackers, which can lead to a faster and less intrusive browsing experience.
Promote LibreWolf. You can add any of these badges on your website.
LibreWolf just makes my work easier and faster, it only needs some configuration and you're done. To be honest uBlock-Origin is the best Ad-Block in my opinion, it's the only one I can trust for privacy!
If user privacy and security are your top priorities, then LibreWolf is a strong choice. It improves upon Firefox's already extensive privacy features, making it particularly appealing for privacy-conscious users.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if LibreWolf is good.
Check the traffic stats of LibreWolf on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of LibreWolf on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of LibreWolf's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of LibreWolf on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about LibreWolf on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Privacy vs. Functionality Debate: uBlock Origin’s full power is available on browsers like Firefox and LibreWolf, which continue to support a broader range of extension APIs. Users may choose to switch browsers if they require the full ad blocking capabilities. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Seems like a lot of people here have never heard of Libre Wolfe. Check it out at https://librewolf.net/ I could see this becoming a fully independent open-source project, and then supporting that. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Don't care, already moved on and happy with Librewolf (https://librewolf.net/). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Independent FOSS forks of firefox without Mozilla services / tracking exist https://librewolf.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> Does curl need a license to send HTTP requests for me? No, but if they had one and it was phrased like this one, the license itself would be limited to these activities. If you want something to decry from Mozilla's terms, pay attention to this part: > Every once in a while, Mozilla may decide to update these Terms. We will post the updated Terms online. We will take your continued use of Firefox as acceptance... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
I have long left the sinking ship and switched to enshitified https://librewolf.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
This made me look into Firefox forks/alternatives: Librewolf [1] seems to be fairly active (last commit on Codeberg was last week) and up-to-date with the latest upstream releases (mirrors FF's versioning scheme and matches their latest). Has a nice focus on privacy and no-telemetry. Floorp [2] also looks active (last commit last week), also claims focus on privacy. Based off FF's extended support releases so it... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Yes, though I've never used it: https://librewolf.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> Who is behind librewolf and why should I trust them? https://librewolf.net/#core-contributors They also have links to join other community spaces so you can probably ask them yourself. > They don't seem to be available in any official repos yet other than ones they self-published The only official repos are the ones which the community decides are so. https://codeberg.org/librewolf They've been around long... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
The only way of fighting back is stop using Chrome and preferrably chromium based browsers. I recommend using https://librewolf.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
You should look into the homepage linked from there https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock instead of Firefox, because that's built and delivered with much desired settings, while the undesired stuff is left out. Which you'd have otherwise to setup manually, put together piece-wise from countless different places, because there is no place who has it all. By the way, they have their own redddit, too. Which leads to... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
I recently switched to LibreWolf[0] and, after tweaking a few settings that were more zealous that I'd like, it has been just as good as vanilla FF. 0: https://librewolf.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
The original plan was to self-host my blog and write there but lot of stuff happend and I still haven't created a self-hosted blog. So I will stick to dev.to for my next posts as my good old waterfox classic browser was killed by "overjavascriptification" from all sides. Now I am on a browser mix of my good old waterfox, librewolf and ungoogled chromium. I will evaluate thorium and mercury next. Why don't I use... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Https://librewolf.net/ And fallback to Firefox when things don't work. Which is usually on sketchy websites, websites that have heavy bot protection and fingerprinting or ones that use gpu APIs. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Https://librewolf.net/ - only a few tweaks to enable/disable to have sessions persist across quitting and re-opening but - as with any software updates, us users always suffer in having to re-check over all options to see what things changed on us (if we're lucky and get an option). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> D. The main problem with ads is that they stimulate more unnecessary consumption The main problem with ads is... I do not want them. My computer, my electricity, my network, my ISP contract, my privacy, my life and my decision. https://librewolf.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Librewolf will hopefully strip it out. - https://librewolf.net (Firefox but with good defaults and bloat stripped out). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Check out librewolf - Firefox with with all “spy” stuff disabled https://librewolf.net/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Wasn't this niche already occupied by https://librewolf.net/ ? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Cromite[0] is the best on Android, it's a privacy-oriented open source patchset on top of Chromium. Cromite has a desktop build, but it's a bit more experimental than the mobile build, so you can use Ungoogled Chromium[1] instead. Ungoogled is also a privacy-oriented open source patchset on top of Chromium. Check the beta flags to enable some more interesting features like getClientRect anti-fingerprinting... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
You are incorrect. Please take a look at the default preferences that they ship, as they are a large and important part of it. Literally on the front page: https://librewolf.net You're here to astroturf for Mozilla or Google, aren't you? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
LibreWolf, an open-source web browser focused on privacy and security, is gaining traction among users seeking an alternative to mainstream options like Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome. Positioned within the broader categories of web browsers, browsing experience, security and privacy, and customizable web browsers, it provides a distinctive choice alongside competitors like Brave, Tor Browser, Vivaldi, Opera, and Waterfox.
A defining feature of LibreWolf is its robust commitment to user privacy. Unlike many other browsers, it comes with telemetry turned off by default, ensuring that no data about user activity is collected. This no-telemetry approach distinguishes LibreWolf from its cousin, Firefox, which requires users to manually opt-out of data collection. Many users who have expressed discontent with Mozilla's data practices have found refuge in LibreWolf’s principled stance on privacy.
Another advantage users have noted is LibreWolf's lighter impact on system resources. It is described as having fewer background processes compared to alternatives like Brave, which is appreciated by users on systems with limited resources. This efficiency aligns with user preferences for faster browsing experiences without compromising privacy.
Despite its favorable features, LibreWolf does have some limitations. One prominent drawback is its availability only for desktop platforms, as highlighted in articles discussing privacy-focused browsers. This limitation necessitates the use of other browsers, like Firefox or Brave, for users who require synchronization across multiple devices, including smartphones.
LibreWolf remains an independent project, unaffiliated with Mozilla, yet it closely follows Firefox's stable source code. This connection ensures that LibreWolf remains updated with the latest security patches and features, further cementing its reputation as a viable alternative for privacy-conscious users. However, discussions within technical communities, such as those on Hacker News, reveal some confusion about the project's affiliations and the trustworthiness of its developers. Nonetheless, links to community spaces and a transparent development process seem to help mitigate concerns.
In the competitive landscape of privacy-centered browsers, LibreWolf is often mentioned alongside Tor Browser and other forked projects like Mullvad and Waterfox. While Tor is known for its anonymity features, LibreWolf appeals to users who desire a straightforward, privacy-focused browsing experience without the complexities often associated with Tor.
Overall, public sentiment around LibreWolf is largely positive, driven by its uncompromising approach to privacy and minimalistic resource usage. However, its current limitations, particularly its desktop-only availability, could hinder wider adoption. As privacy concerns continue to push users away from mainstream browsers, LibreWolf is well-positioned to capture the attention of those who prioritize data privacy and an uncluttered browsing experience.
Do you know an article comparing LibreWolf to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is LibreWolf good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss LibreWolf here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
