This page is designed to help you find out whether ikiwiki is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
Git-based version control
Ikiwiki uses Git for version control, allowing for easy tracking of changes and collaboration. Users familiar with Git can easily contribute and manage content.
Markdown support
It supports multiple markup languages, including Markdown, making it flexible and user-friendly for those who are already accustomed to such formats.
Static site generation
Ikiwiki is a static site generator, which means it can create fast-loading websites since there are no server-side computations for each page load.
Plugin system
The extensive plugin system allows users to extend functionality easily, offering customization and additional features to tailor the site to specific needs.
Wiki functionality
Ikiwiki retains full wiki functionality while allowing content to be stored and managed in a version-controlled repository.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if ikiwiki is good.
Check the traffic stats of ikiwiki on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of ikiwiki on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of ikiwiki's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of ikiwiki on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about ikiwiki on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
From the welcome post linked at the top[1] I believe it's using https://ikiwiki.info/ [1] https://blog.liw.fi/posts/welcome/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Arguably something like ikiwiki or gollum is doing this. These are both wikis that use git as their backend 'database'. I happen to like wikis like this a lot better over wikis that store their data in mysql or some other traditional SQL backend. Source: almost 3 years ago
I use ikiwiki, but I have also seen gollum mentioned here. Source: about 4 years ago
Flat text. I'd lean strongly toward something written using Markdown and converted to HTML, though depending on the specific configuration I wanted, straight raw HTML could very well end up being the format. This is a case where content is vastly more significant than presentation or tools used, and simpler is better. Some might also use tools such as Emacs org-mode, Joey Hess's Ikiwiki (https://ikiwiki.info/),... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
This is ostensibly the approach by ikiwiki, which uses Git, and also that of Code Co-op (a distributed revision control system with a wiki feature). Source: over 5 years ago
We mention in Behind the scenes that we use ikiwiki for generating the website. Source: over 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing ikiwiki to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is ikiwiki good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss ikiwiki here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.