Hydraulic Conveyor Reviews and details

Social recommendations and mentions

• Tour of new custom M1 macOS runners racks with Christina Warren [video]

  So much effort, just to run Xcode remotely. For those of you who want to ship code to macOS from CI (e.g. Electron apps), you should check out my companies product at https://hydraulic.dev/ ... It lets you package, sign, notarize and upload self-updating Mac apps from any OS including Linux. Amongst other things it bundles Sparkle on the fly also, so you don't have to deal with Squirrel, and it can do the same... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• What improvements would you like to see for Electron app deployment?

  I work on a tool that simplifies deploying desktop apps, and we're looking at what improvements the Electron community might benefit from the most. It'd be great to get feedback on where your biggest pain points are and what you'd find most valuable in such a tool. Source: 7 months ago

• Is macOS’s new XProtect behavioural security preparing to go live?

  You could try experimenting with Hydraulic Conveyor [1]. I built it originally due to the frustrations involved in distributing P2P software during my old Bitcoin days so you won't get any hate from me about that ;) Conveyor can package Electron apps and also do all the Mac specific stuff from any platform including Linux. So it can sign, notarize and staple the app itself, also bundling Sparkle updates as it... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• ToDesktop – Web app to desktop app in minutes

  What do you think is a fair price for a solo dev trialling a small app? I'm asking because my firm makes a competitor to ToDesktop (sort of) [1], and this is a question we often get. It's free for open source apps and cheaper than ToDesktop, but the "I just want to trial an idea and not spend any money on it" use case isn't well supported by this pricing model. One possibility is a trial period, but then how long... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Flatpak Is Not the Future

  Apple bundles compared to Flatpaks: • Both use reverse DNS to globally identify themselves, neither actually verifies DNS ownership. • Almost everything is a bundle, except for CLI apps. FlatPaks on the other hand are being auto-converted from previous packaging systems. • Bundles don't have dependencies. In theory they can, but in practice they never do. You depend on macOS/iOS as a unitary platform and bundles... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• PackagingCon – a conference only for software package management

  > Java didn’t have any shared library concerns It definitely does have such concerns, but the community has just accepted that the JDK will never help with this and so every JAR that uses a native library hacks around the lack of proper support in its own unique and special way. Usually some project-specific ad-hoc code that extracts native libraries into some directory in the user's home directory. Is the "cache"... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Briefcase: Convert a Python project into a standalone native application

  Follow the GitHub issue or enter your email address in "Subscribe to the blog" on https://hydraulic.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago