The next time this happens I'll move to a self hosted solution, like haraka or anonaddy. Source: over 1 year ago
Haraka Like: Simple to hook into the processing pipeline Dislike: Node.js and had some issues with stability when I last tried it. Source: over 1 year ago
For the record, I'm using dovecot (https://www.dovecot.org/) for IMAP and Haraka (https://haraka.github.io/) for SMTP. Source: about 2 years ago
Haraka (https://haraka.github.io/) is a plugin-based mailserver written in JavaScript. I've messed with postfix before but found Haraka easier because instead of arcane configuration files I can just read, copy, and tweak a plugin to suit my needs. Policies for receiving, storing, forwarding, and ignoring mail can be arbitrarily complex. Source: over 2 years ago
Exoprise leverages a node-based SMTP application, haraka, to process its messages as a well as series of custom plugins. You can read more about haraka here. Since its node-based its event driven, incredibly fast, and highly scable. Our auto-responders process 100’s of thousands of inbound and outbound messages each day, typically in < 10 milliseconds per each message. Source: over 2 years ago
There are some really interesting choices for F/OSS email servers these days. There are SMTP+IMAP: - maddy[0] (I use this) - chasquid[1] - docker-mailserver[2] And combinations: - haraka[3]/ZoneMTA[4] (SMTP) + wilduck[5] (IMAP) Modoboa brings something new in that it bundles together the frontend but I'm very happy with Thunderbird (and there are other frontends like Sogo) -- the competition is stiff and modoboa... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Well w/o setting up your own server, it can hardly get any better. But if you go down the route of your own server, maybe check https://haraka.github.io/. It's plugin based so you should be able to write specific plugin for your purposes. Source: almost 3 years ago
Maddy is fantastic -- for greater flexibility/ease of deployment, you can pre-provision your DKIM keys as well. Maddy also works wonderfully when combined with other technologies, it's nice, simple and light. It works great with Haraka[0] on the outside proxying email to maddy instances on the inside. I've also combined it with SES provisioned with Pulumi + k8s[1] (for those on AWS), which is a little bit more... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Some stuff I've worked on recently: - kcup[0] serves a single page over HTTP/S - async-wait-for-promise[1] - a tiny npm package for waiting on a condition or timeout (README contains why the certain combination didn't already exist) - mailtrain-form-post-sidecar[2] - a little sidecar container for mailtrain that accepts form POSTs for mailing list signups - redis-bootleg-backup[3] - a tool for taking backups of... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Haraka to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Haraka. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.