Listed in
High Performance
Haraka is designed for high throughput and scalability, making it suitable for handling a large volume of emails efficiently.
Plugin Architecture
It supports a flexible plugin architecture, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality easily.
Open Source
Being open-source software, Haraka is freely available for use, modification, and distribution, encouraging community contributions and transparency.
Asynchronous and Event-Driven
Built on Node.js, Haraka benefits from asynchronous and event-driven programming, which enhances its speed and performance.
Support for Modern Email Protocols
Haraka supports modern email protocols such as SMTP with STARTTLS, allowing secure communication over the network.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Haraka is good.
Check the traffic stats of Haraka on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Haraka on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Haraka's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Haraka on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Haraka on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Haraka is a fast SMTP server written in Node, which made it a natural fit. A small plugin does two things:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Edge cases have probably slipped past my memory, but back in the day I iused to use qpsmtpd as an incoming SMTP server for processing a decent volume of mail. As you'll see the core of qpsmtpd was very light but it was very extensible and allowed plugins to make changes/rejections to incoming mail at SMTP-time and that was very useful. These days the project was superseded by https://haraka.github.io/ The only... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Craigslist has also uses Haraka to scale their email. https://haraka.github.io There are plenty of open source email alternatives now days. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
The next time this happens I'll move to a self hosted solution, like haraka or anonaddy. Source: over 3 years ago
Haraka Like: Simple to hook into the processing pipeline Dislike: Node.js and had some issues with stability when I last tried it. Source: almost 4 years ago
For the record, I'm using dovecot (https://www.dovecot.org/) for IMAP and Haraka (https://haraka.github.io/) for SMTP. Source: over 4 years ago
Haraka (https://haraka.github.io/) is a plugin-based mailserver written in JavaScript. I've messed with postfix before but found Haraka easier because instead of arcane configuration files I can just read, copy, and tweak a plugin to suit my needs. Policies for receiving, storing, forwarding, and ignoring mail can be arbitrarily complex. Source: almost 5 years ago
Exoprise leverages a node-based SMTP application, haraka, to process its messages as a well as series of custom plugins. You can read more about haraka here. Since its node-based its event driven, incredibly fast, and highly scable. Our auto-responders process 100’s of thousands of inbound and outbound messages each day, typically in < 10 milliseconds per each message. Source: almost 5 years ago
There are some really interesting choices for F/OSS email servers these days. There are SMTP+IMAP: - maddy[0] (I use this) - chasquid[1] - docker-mailserver[2] And combinations: - haraka[3]/ZoneMTA[4] (SMTP) + wilduck[5] (IMAP) Modoboa brings something new in that it bundles together the frontend but I'm very happy with Thunderbird (and there are other frontends like Sogo) -- the competition is stiff and modoboa... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
Well w/o setting up your own server, it can hardly get any better. But if you go down the route of your own server, maybe check https://haraka.github.io/. It's plugin based so you should be able to write specific plugin for your purposes. Source: about 5 years ago
Maddy is fantastic -- for greater flexibility/ease of deployment, you can pre-provision your DKIM keys as well. Maddy also works wonderfully when combined with other technologies, it's nice, simple and light. It works great with Haraka[0] on the outside proxying email to maddy instances on the inside. I've also combined it with SES provisioned with Pulumi + k8s[1] (for those on AWS), which is a little bit more... - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
Some stuff I've worked on recently: - kcup[0] serves a single page over HTTP/S - async-wait-for-promise[1] - a tiny npm package for waiting on a condition or timeout (README contains why the certain combination didn't already exist) - mailtrain-form-post-sidecar[2] - a little sidecar container for mailtrain that accepts form POSTs for mailing list signups - redis-bootleg-backup[3] - a tool for taking backups of... - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Haraka to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Haraka good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Haraka here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.