During my search for deploying Lambdas via GitHub actions, I came across a tutorial that utilized ncc for converting TypeScript and bundling. While ncc is effective, I discovered esbuild, which proved to be significantly faster and perfectly suited to my requirements. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
The advent of esbuild, the native support for ES Modules in browsers, the widespread adoption of import map, the emergence of tools like Native Federation, and the Nx ecosystem all combine to forge a flexible and well-maintained Micro Frontend Architecture. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
In part 3 We jump into the world of bundlers, comparing webpack, esbuild, vite, and parcel 2. This section aims to guide developers through each bundler, focusing on their performance, compatibility, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Unlike Webpack, the Vite DevServer only compiles files when they are requested. It leverages ES module imports, which allow JS files to import other files without needing to bundle them together during development. When one file changes, only that file needs to be re-compiled, and the rest can remain unchanged. Project files are compiled with Rollup.js. Third-party dependencies in node_modules are pre-compiled... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
The functions will bundle using esbuild. For that, it is required to install esbuild globally:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
TSX is the newest and most improved version of our ts-node, using ESBuild to transpile TS files to JS very quickly. The most interesting part is that TSX was developed to be a complete replacement for Node, so you can actually use TSX as a TypeScript REPL, if you install it globally with npm I -g tsx, just run tsx in your terminal and you can write TSX natively. But what's even cooler is that you can load TSX... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Esbuild plus Vite is out of developer preview and enabled by default, yielding 67%, 87%, 80% speed improvements for build time, hybrid build time and hybrid serve time respectively. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
The famous bundler is Webpack, but esbuild is the fastest one… Well, until Bun 🍔. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
For production, Vite can use another bundler, esbuild, to speed up transpilation and minification, while it in production also uses the bundler Rollup to create the client side JS bundle, due to Rollup's flexible API. Even though Vite uses ESM in development environment, for speed. In the future Vite may use esbuild entirely for bundling instead of Rollup, due to the speed it would gain. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
The best way to accomplish this is through bundling. Microsoft recommends utilizing esbuild for bundling your VS Code extensions due to its speed and efficiency. Webpack is another good alternative. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
To bundle our code in this example we're going to use esbuild, because it's fast and easy to use. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Esbuild - the rescue! No longer struggling with configs, file extensions or similar. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Since Lit is just javascript files that don’t require a custom compiler or build tooling, we decided to use esbuild (via @nx/esbuild), which is written in Go and extremely fast. On the other hand, the old UI used the @angular-builders/custom-webpack:browser builder, which uses webpack under the hood. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
I typically handle this through my build script. For example I use esbuild, and my script includes this. Source: 11 months ago
I will use TypeScript with esbuild bundler, which is a fast and highly efficient builder for JavaScript and TypeScript. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Bundling extensions — in general, custom extension formats require custom bundling tools. Currently, as it’s still early, I put everything into a single JSON file with Node.js and esbuild bundler, but I’m exploring how to develop a custom Vite plugin for this purpose;. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Chris favours using the ESBuild bundler to work out the shortcomings. ESBuild can bundle CSS files into a single CSS file. ESBuild can transform your natively nested CSS to "flat" CSS -- this is important since nesting is not in Firefox currently. Therefore, with the aid of ESBuild, Chris has feature parity for his usage of Sass. The other Sass features like mixins and inheritance do not appeal to Chris. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Rollup is highly configurable via plugins. It also supports a wide range of transpilation targets. However, it's written in JavaScript (well, TypeScript) so there's a ceiling on how fast it can go. Esbuild and swc are orders-of-magnitude faster than Rollup. Source: 12 months ago
Want to import a package / file conveniently from esm.sh or unpkg or directly from a GitHub repo for a one-off script (for example). To do this I created a custom ESBuild plugin to handle HTTP imports - that worked for ,js files. To support running both ESM and CJS, I use tsx. Source: about 1 year ago
Esbuild – is an easy-to-configure bundler,. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Do you know an article comparing esbuild to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about esbuild. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.