Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

zsh VS PureScript

Compare zsh VS PureScript and see what are their differences

bunq
bank of the Free! Mobile banking that makes life easy. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

zsh logo zsh

The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

PureScript logo PureScript

PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript.
  • zsh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-09
  • PureScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-19

We recommend LibHunt PureScript for discovery and comparisons of trending PureScript projects.

zsh features and specs

  • Powerful Scripting
    zsh offers advanced scripting capabilities, including features like associative arrays, floating-point arithmetic, and powerful loops and conditionals, making it ideal for complex scripting tasks.
  • Customizability
    zsh provides extensive customization options. Users can personalize prompts, key bindings, and much more using various modules and plugins, such as oh-my-zsh.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The support for plugins in zsh, especially through frameworks like oh-my-zsh, allows users to easily add functionalities and enhance the shell experience, offering a rich ecosystem of community-contributed plugins.
  • Auto-suggestions and Command Correction
    zsh features intelligent auto-suggestions and command correction capabilities, which can drastically improve efficiency and reduce errors while typing commands.
  • Compatibility with Bash
    zsh is largely compatible with bash, meaning most bash scripts and commands will run without modification, facilitating a smoother transition for users migrating from bash.

Possible disadvantages of zsh

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customizability, zsh can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time to learn and configure effectively.
  • Initial Configuration
    Setting up zsh for the first time can be more complex compared to simpler shells like bash, especially when including frameworks like oh-my-zsh, which can require additional configuration.
  • Performance Overhead
    Loading many plugins and customizations can introduce a performance hit, making zsh slower to start compared to more lightweight shells.
  • Resource Consumption
    zsh, particularly with extensive customizations and plugins, can consume more system resources (memory and CPU) than simpler shells like bash.
  • Inconsistent Behavior with Legacy Scripts
    While zsh is largely compatible with bash, certain edge cases and legacy scripts might exhibit inconsistent behavior, potentially necessitating script rewrites or adjustments.

PureScript features and specs

  • Strong Typing
    PureScript features a robust type system with advanced type inference, which can help catch errors at compile-time and increase code reliability.
  • Immutability
    PureScript promotes immutability by default, leading to more predictable and maintainable code, especially beneficial in concurrent applications.
  • JavaScript Interoperability
    PureScript can interoperate seamlessly with JavaScript, allowing developers to leverage existing JavaScript libraries and tools within PureScript projects.
  • Functional Programming
    PureScript is a purely functional language, offering all the advantages of functional programming such as higher-order functions, and a strong emphasis on functions as first-class citizens.
  • Safety and Predictability
    The language ensures safer and more predictable code by eliminating certain classes of runtime errors through compile-time checks.

Possible disadvantages of PureScript

  • Smaller Community
    Compared to more mainstream languages, PureScript has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources and libraries available.
  • Learning Curve
    PureScript's focus on functional programming and its type system can present a steep learning curve for developers unfamiliar with these concepts.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    The tooling and ecosystem around PureScript may not be as mature or extensive as those of more established languages, which can impact productivity.
  • Performance Overheads
    Due to its focus on immutability and the abstraction over JavaScript, some use-cases might face performance overheads compared to plain JavaScript.
  • Complexity in Interop
    Despite its capability to interoperate with JavaScript, managing the integration between PureScript and JavaScript can sometimes be complex and error-prone.

zsh videos

+ Add

Working with Linux - Terminal, Zsh & Oh My Zsh

More videos:

  • Review - ZSH | A Better Shell
  • Review - You Really Don't Need Oh My Zsh And Here's Why (Rant)

PureScript videos

+ Add

Claudia Doppioslash | Building a Graphical IDE in Elm/Purescript

More videos:

  • Review - Haskell Livecoding - Working on PureScript's IDE (3)
  • Review - PureScript Meetup #13 Type Classes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to zsh and PureScript)

zsh

PureScript

Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
Cryptocurrencies
0% 0
Personal Finance
0 0%
Personal Finance
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
Blockchain
0% 0
Financial Planner
0 0%
Financial Planner
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using zsh and PureScript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PureScript should be more popular than zsh. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

zsh mentions (1)

  • My developer workflow using WSL, tmux and Neovim
    Ubuntu by default comes with the bash shell. Bash is great but I personally find it harder to customize. That is why I use Z shell, more commonly known as zsh. To manage my zsh configuration, I use Oh My Zsh. It has a huge community and makes it trivial to install and use plugins. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

PureScript mentions (2)

  • Building Mystery Mansion Madness without a UI Framework
    Before 2012, all of my websites were made using HTML, CSS and a sprinkling of JS. Then, I went all-in on AngularJS, followed by React. I started using Typescript and then PureScript and learned more frameworks like Halogen and Concur. I even wrote my own UI framework called purescript-deku. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Incrementally Adopting PureScript in a JavaScript Web Application
    I hope you get a chance to try PureScript out in your JS projects! For more learning resources, you can check out PureScript website. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing zsh and PureScript, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

DASH - DASH is a secure, blockchain-based global financial network which offers private transactions.

Haste - Decreases ping in video games.

Loading...