Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

zsh VS Laravel WebSockets

Compare zsh VS Laravel WebSockets and see what are their differences

zsh logo zsh

The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

Laravel WebSockets logo Laravel WebSockets

Laravel WebSockets is a package for Laravel and up that will get your application started with...
  • zsh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-09
  • Laravel WebSockets Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29

zsh features and specs

  • Powerful Scripting
    zsh offers advanced scripting capabilities, including features like associative arrays, floating-point arithmetic, and powerful loops and conditionals, making it ideal for complex scripting tasks.
  • Customizability
    zsh provides extensive customization options. Users can personalize prompts, key bindings, and much more using various modules and plugins, such as oh-my-zsh.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The support for plugins in zsh, especially through frameworks like oh-my-zsh, allows users to easily add functionalities and enhance the shell experience, offering a rich ecosystem of community-contributed plugins.
  • Auto-suggestions and Command Correction
    zsh features intelligent auto-suggestions and command correction capabilities, which can drastically improve efficiency and reduce errors while typing commands.
  • Compatibility with Bash
    zsh is largely compatible with bash, meaning most bash scripts and commands will run without modification, facilitating a smoother transition for users migrating from bash.

Possible disadvantages of zsh

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customizability, zsh can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time to learn and configure effectively.
  • Initial Configuration
    Setting up zsh for the first time can be more complex compared to simpler shells like bash, especially when including frameworks like oh-my-zsh, which can require additional configuration.
  • Performance Overhead
    Loading many plugins and customizations can introduce a performance hit, making zsh slower to start compared to more lightweight shells.
  • Resource Consumption
    zsh, particularly with extensive customizations and plugins, can consume more system resources (memory and CPU) than simpler shells like bash.
  • Inconsistent Behavior with Legacy Scripts
    While zsh is largely compatible with bash, certain edge cases and legacy scripts might exhibit inconsistent behavior, potentially necessitating script rewrites or adjustments.

Laravel WebSockets features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

zsh videos

Working with Linux - Terminal, Zsh & Oh My Zsh

More videos:

  • Review - ZSH | A Better Shell
  • Review - You Really Don't Need Oh My Zsh And Here's Why (Rant)

Laravel WebSockets videos

Using Laravel WebSockets Package

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to zsh and Laravel WebSockets)
Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
58 58%
42% 42
Blockchain
100 100%
0% 0
Documentation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using zsh and Laravel WebSockets. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Laravel WebSockets should be more popular than zsh. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

zsh mentions (1)

  • My developer workflow using WSL, tmux and Neovim
    Ubuntu by default comes with the bash shell. Bash is great but I personally find it harder to customize. That is why I use Z shell, more commonly known as zsh. To manage my zsh configuration, I use Oh My Zsh. It has a huge community and makes it trivial to install and use plugins. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Laravel WebSockets mentions (10)

  • Laravel Websockets vs Soketi vs Laravel Echo Server
    Which of these do you use for your realtime Laravel applications? Soketi seems good but documentation doesn't seem that good. Laravel Websockets is mentioned in the official Laravel docs as a Pusher alternative,and Laravel Echo Server looks good but hasn't been updated for a year. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Laravel Echo, Pusher & Soketi in an existing Laravel site
    Latavel websocket https://beyondco.de/docs/laravel-websockets/getting-started/introduction pure php implementation of pusher protocol. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Unencrypted websockets over secure site
    I am trying implement Laravel's websockets using the documentation from BeyondCode's Websockets Pacakge that implements Pusher type connections. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Programming Real-Time Web Applications With TALL Stack
    Using Laravel Websockets, broadcast events are sent to Livewire components. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • A Central Clock for Laravel Web Applications with ReactPHP
    Events are broadcast using Laravel Echo Server, Laravel Websockets, or Soketi. Say on a channel time. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing zsh and Laravel WebSockets, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

Ratchet - Build mobile apps with simple HTML, CSS, and JS components.

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

soketi - Your simple, fast, and resilient open-source WS server.

DASH - DASH is a secure, blockchain-based global financial network which offers private transactions.

PowerShell Plus - Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.