Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Zephyr VS IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compare Zephyr VS IBM Engineering Workflow Management and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Zephyr logo Zephyr

Zephyr is a small real-time operating system for connected, resource-constrained devices supporting...

IBM Engineering Workflow Management logo IBM Engineering Workflow Management

IBM Engineering Workflow Management lets you use one tool to collaborate across teams, manage code, run meetings, plan sprints and track work - cloud or on-premise.
  • Zephyr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-03
  • IBM Engineering Workflow Management Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17

Zephyr features and specs

  • Scalability
    Zephyr is designed to be scalable and can support applications from small embedded devices to larger systems with resource constraints.
  • Modularity
    The kernel is highly modular, allowing developers to include only the components needed for their specific application, which helps in optimizing resource usage.
  • Support for Multiple Architectures
    Zephyr supports a wide range of hardware architectures, including x86, ARM, RISC-V, and others, making it versatile for different hardware platforms.
  • Real-time Capabilities
    Zephyr has built-in real-time operating system (RTOS) capabilities, which are crucial for time-sensitive applications and can meet stringent timing requirements.
  • Security Features
    Zephyr includes multiple layers of security, such as memory protection, kernel object permission, and stack overflow protection, to help secure embedded applications.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Backed by the Linux Foundation, Zephyr has a strong community and ecosystem, which means robust support, extensive documentation, and continuous development.
  • Open Source
    Zephyr's open-source nature enables transparency, community contributions, and the ability for organizations to customize the OS to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Zephyr

  • Complexity
    Due to its modular and scalable nature, Zephyr can be complex to set up and configure, especially for beginners who may find the learning curve steep.
  • Limited Middleware
    While Zephyr supports a variety of hardware, its middleware offerings may not be as extensive or mature as those provided by more established OSes like FreeRTOS.
  • Documentation Gaps
    Although the community is active, there are areas where documentation could be more comprehensive and detailed, which can hinder quick adoption and troubleshooting.
  • Resource Intensive
    Given its wide range of features and capabilities, Zephyr can sometimes be more resource-intensive compared to more minimalist RTOS options, which might be a concern for extremely resource-constrained environments.
  • Vendor Lock-in Risk
    While Zephyr aims to be vendor-neutral, there can be dependencies on certain hardware platforms or vendors, which might lead to a form of vendor lock-in.

IBM Engineering Workflow Management features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers a full suite of tools for version control, task tracking, and continuous builds, all integrated into one platform.
  • Scalability
    The software is designed to handle projects of all sizes, making it suitable for both small teams and large enterprises.
  • Customization and Flexibility
    It provides customizable workflows and processes to fit the specific needs of an organization.
  • Collaborative Environment
    Facilitates real-time collaboration across distributed teams, enhancing productivity and communication.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Seamlessly integrates with other IBM tools and various third-party applications, enhancing its versatility.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Engineering Workflow Management

  • Complexity
    The comprehensive nature of the tool can lead to a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Cost
    It is relatively expensive compared to other workflow management solutions, which might be a concern for smaller organizations.
  • Performance Issues
    Users have reported occasional performance issues, particularly with large datasets or complex configurations.
  • User Interface
    The interface can be perceived as outdated or not as intuitive as some modern competitors.
  • Dependency on IBM Ecosystem
    Organizations heavily relying on non-IBM tools might face challenges integrating IBM EWM smoothly into their existing workflows.

Analysis of Zephyr

Overall verdict

  • Zephyr is considered a robust and reliable choice for developers needing a versatile RTOS for IoT and embedded systems applications.

Why this product is good

  • Zephyr is a scalable, real-time operating system (RTOS) supported by the Linux Foundation, designed specifically for resource-constrained devices across IoT. It features a small footprint, modular architecture, and support for a wide range of hardware platforms, making it ideal for embedded systems. Zephyr also benefits from a strong community and industry support, ensuring regular updates and improvements.

Recommended for

  • Developers working on IoT projects
  • Companies looking for a scalable RTOS for embedded devices
  • Projects requiring a modular and customizable operating system
  • Teams that value strong community and industry support

Zephyr videos

+ Add

Zephyr - Rework Review & Build

More videos:

  • Review - Warframe Reviews - Zephyr
  • Review - NIKI - Zephyr ALBUM REVIEW

IBM Engineering Workflow Management videos

+ Add

IBM Engineering Workflow Management

More videos:

  • Review - IBM Engineering Workflow Management - Simplified Linking in EWM 7.0.2
  • Review - IBM Engineering Workflow Management - Linking Git Pull Request with work items in EWM 7.0.1

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zephyr and IBM Engineering Workflow Management)

Zephyr

IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Software Testing
100 100%
Software Testing
0% 0
Project Management
33 33%
Project Management
67% 67
QA
100 100%
QA
0% 0
Website Testing
46 46%
Website Testing
54% 54

User comments

Share your experience with using Zephyr and IBM Engineering Workflow Management. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zephyr seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zephyr mentions (11)

  • A Web based Broadcast Assistant
    Combining the Zephyr RTOS stack, running on an affordable nRF52840 Dongle with the power of modern web technologies turned out quite well and it has also allowed us to experiment with multiple subgroups, supported by the specs, but not yet by many devices in the market (at the time of writing at least - be sure to keep an eye out for that!). - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Auracast and multiple subgroups
    Also, it's really great to see that the RFcreations mini-moreph and blueSpy software was able to capture and render this slightly more advanced source and that it was possible to build using Zephyr RTOS and the nRF52840 Dongle. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • A simple Broadcast Audio Source
    The Zephyr RTOS contains some great Bluetooth LE Audio related samples. One of them is the Basic Audio Profile (BAP) Broadcast Source sample. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Capturing the perfect (radio) wave
    I thought about what would be a good first capture, and remembered, I recently made a very simple Bluetooth Low Energy demo using Zephyr and Web, covered in an earlier post. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • It's 2023 why embedded development is so cumbersome?(rant)
    Check out Zephyr OS and Platform IO. Zephyr is part of the Linux foundation and has similarities to Linux with how it performs hardware abstraction (device tree). Platform IO integrates with other frameworks including mbed and Arduino. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

IBM Engineering Workflow Management mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Engineering Workflow Management yet. Tracking of IBM Engineering Workflow Management recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zephyr and IBM Engineering Workflow Management, you can also consider the following products

TestRail - TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

Azure DevOps - Visual Studio dev tools & services make app development easy for any platform & language. Try our Mac & Windows code editor, IDE, or Azure DevOps for free.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

PractiTest - PractiTest is a cloud based Innovative test management tool.

Optimizely - A/B testing you'll actually use.

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

Loading...