Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

YUM Package Manager VS AppImageKit

Compare YUM Package Manager VS AppImageKit and see what are their differences

YUM Package Manager logo YUM Package Manager

Yum is an automatic updater and package installer/remover for rpm systems.

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere
  • YUM Package Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-07
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to YUM Package Manager and AppImageKit)
Front End Package Manager
Package Manager
59 59%
41% 41
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Windows Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using YUM Package Manager and AppImageKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit seems to be a lot more popular than YUM Package Manager. While we know about 52 links to AppImageKit, we've tracked only 1 mention of YUM Package Manager. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

YUM Package Manager mentions (1)

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 10 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing YUM Package Manager and AppImageKit, you can also consider the following products

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

Yarn - Yarn is a package manager for your code.

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.