AppImageKit VS Chocolatey
Compare AppImageKit VS Chocolatey and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
AppImageKit
Flatpak
FLATHUB
Snapcraft
AppImageHub
Zero Install
Homebrew
AppImageLauncher
Chocolatey
Ninite
Scoop
Homebrew
Just Install
Patch My PC
PDQ Deploy
WAPT Community
AppImageKit ChocolateyNo AppImageKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Chocolatey should be more popular than AppImageKit. It has been mentiond 252 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 10 months ago
Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 10 months ago
Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/. Source: 6 months ago
For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux
Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.
FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here
Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows
Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS