Based on our record, Stack Overflow Trends should be more popular than You Need A Wiki. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Personally I use YNAW (You Need A Wiki), which makes you a wiki using google drive, I know obsidian is also good but it just doesn't jive right for me. Source: 6 months ago
I personally use google drive, and use https://youneedawiki.com/ to display it as a wiki. Completely free. Source: about 1 year ago
Is there a wiki that has a sidebar which uses some kind of expandable / collapsable folder structure that makes the taxonomy really clear? Here's an example as used in youneedawiki. I really like how clear and fast it is to see where you are in any particular knowledge branch. Source: about 1 year ago
Trying to nail down what tools we will use as a fully remote team needing to work asynchronously. We will have paid versions of GitHub (Teams) and Google Workspace for email / calendar and docs. I did look at notion, clickup but I honestly think I prefer limiting our spend on an extra tool. What I like about notion is how its got a wiki structure, and this is where G-Docs leaves us short. The performance of... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
There's an add-on to Google drive called "You Need a Wiki" that lets you build your own Wikipedia out of folders and Google Docs. The ability to add links between sites and documents makes it an excellent way to organise research and notes. Source: over 1 year ago
It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.
Community Questions for Confluence - Keep questions and answers in one place with an engaging, community-driven Q&A discussion forum, powered by Confluence
Notion - All-in-one workspace. One tool for your whole team. Write, plan, and get organized.
Stack Roboflow - Coding questions pondered by an AI.
Automated Documentation by Tettra - Tettra lets you automate your documentation with Zapier
Smarty Bot - Wiki for tech teams, right where work happens