Yasm VS CheerpX for Flash

Trust me, at least on Intel, you do not want to write assembly inside your C/C++ code, unless it's just a couple of lines. The usual AT&T syntax will drive you nuts, and the additional syntax for embedding assembly only adds to the misery. For any reasonable amounts (say, you want a function or several) of assembly, you want Intel syntax and standalone assembly files. NASM is a great tool, although YASM should... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Things like yasm only have tasm support...not sure if that will be enough in your case. Source: about 2 years ago

Can also recommend the rewrite of NASM, YASM. https://yasm.tortall.net/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Flash on web is dead , yes. But apart from Ruffle you also have commercial solutions from Cheerp Flash. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

From the point of view of Adobe, Flash is a legacy technology. Simply put, there is not enough business to be made with it at Adobe's scale. It is safe to assume that the Flash team has either left the company or moved to other roles in the meantime. The Flash codebase is gigantic, evolved over decades and probably includes IP with non-obvious licensing restriction (RTMP is an example that pops to mind). Porting... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

There is a company that got Flash working in WASM but they don't have public pricing so it's probably crazy expensive. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Running on top of CheerpX after plugin got kicked out of the browser, but thanks to WebAssembly + WebGL it is back. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Here, have fun with it. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago