CheerpX for Flash VS LLVM

Flash on web is dead , yes. But apart from Ruffle you also have commercial solutions from Cheerp Flash. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

From the point of view of Adobe, Flash is a legacy technology. Simply put, there is not enough business to be made with it at Adobe's scale. It is safe to assume that the Flash team has either left the company or moved to other roles in the meantime. The Flash codebase is gigantic, evolved over decades and probably includes IP with non-obvious licensing restriction (RTMP is an example that pops to mind). Porting... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

There is a company that got Flash working in WASM but they don't have public pricing so it's probably crazy expensive. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Running on top of CheerpX after plugin got kicked out of the browser, but thanks to WebAssembly + WebGL it is back. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Here, have fun with it. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

In conclusion, none of the proposed changes to the Ruby version of the code makes a dent in the Crystal version. This is not entirely Crystal's doing: it uses the LLVM backend, which generates very optimized binaries. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago

'Computer Architeture: A Quantitative Apporach" and/or more specific design types (mips, arm, etc) can be found under the Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Architeture and Design. "Getting Started with LLVM Core Libraries: Get to Grips With Llvm Essentials and Use the Core Libraries to Build Advanced Tools " "The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 1) : LLVM" https://aosabook.org/en/v1/llvm.html... - Source: Hacker News / 24 days ago

You can never mistake type_declaration with an identifier, otherwise the program will not work. Aside from that constraint, you are free to name them whatever you like, there is no one standard, and each parser has it own naming conventions, unless you are planning to use something like LLVM. If you are interested, you can see examples of naming in different language parsers in the AST Explorer. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

C++ compiler which compiles the Rust as if it were C++ (LLVM). Source: 5 months ago