Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Xfce-Terminal VS Pijul

Compare Xfce-Terminal VS Pijul and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Xfce-Terminal logo Xfce-Terminal

Terminal is a modern terminal emulator for the Unix/Linux desktop - primarily for the Xfce desktop...

Pijul logo Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
  • Xfce-Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • Pijul Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Xfce-Terminal features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Xfce-Terminal is designed to be lightweight, which makes it fast and responsive, even on older hardware.
  • Customizable Appearance
    Users can customize the appearance of the terminal, including font size, colors, and transparency settings.
  • Tabbed Interface
    It supports a tabbed interface, allowing users to manage multiple terminal sessions within a single window.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Xfce-Terminal allows the use of keyboard shortcuts, which enhances the user experience by enabling quick operations.
  • Compatibility
    Since it is part of the Xfce desktop environment, it integrates well with other Xfce applications and components.

Possible disadvantages of Xfce-Terminal

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other terminal emulators, Xfce-Terminal may lack advanced features such as built-in split panes or advanced session management.
  • Less Community Support
    Being less popular than some major terminal emulators, it might have less community support and fewer extensions or plugins available.
  • Basic UI
    While functional, the user interface is quite basic and may not appeal to users who prefer more visually enriched applications.
  • Dependent on Xfce Libraries
    Although it can run on other environments, it pulls in Xfce libraries, which might not be preferred by users trying to minimize dependencies.

Pijul features and specs

  • Patch-Based System
    Pijul is based on a true patch-based model, where changes are stored as patches. This allows for more granular control and the ability to handle conflicts more naturally than in traditional version control systems.
  • Commute-ability
    Pijul allows patches to commute, meaning they can be rearranged freely as long as they do not directly conflict with each other. This can make collaboration simpler as developers can work in parallel seamlessly.
  • Conflict Resolution
    The system offers more sophisticated conflict resolution mechanisms, enabling users to resolve conflicts at the patch level rather than entire commits, making it easier to pinpoint and address issues.
  • Mathematical Foundations
    Pijul is based on a strong theoretical foundation (Darcs theory) that provides a rigorous mathematical framework for version control logic, offering a structured and reliable approach to merging and branching.
  • Branching and Merging
    Branching and merging in Pijul are straightforward and intuitive, eliminating many of the complexities associated with these processes in other systems.

Possible disadvantages of Pijul

  • Maturity and Adoption
    As a relatively new system, Pijul may not be as mature as other VCS solutions like Git, possibly leading to a lack of community support, plugins, and resources.
  • Tooling
    The ecosystem around Pijul, including integrations with other tools like IDEs and CI/CD systems, is still in development, potentially complicating its use in professional environments.
  • Learning Curve
    The patch-based approach and the principles behind Pijul might be unfamiliar to users accustomed to traditional version control systems, resulting in a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance
    For very large repositories or numerous patches, performance could potentially be an issue due to the complexity of operations on patches, though active improvements are being made.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    The community and ecosystem around Pijul are smaller compared to more established version control systems, which may hinder the availability of guides, plug-ins, or extensions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Xfce-Terminal and Pijul)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Xfce-Terminal and Pijul. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pijul seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 48 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Xfce-Terminal mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Xfce-Terminal yet. Tracking of Xfce-Terminal recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Pijul mentions (48)

  • Evo: Version control that works the way you think
    Obligatory link to https://pijul.org/ which I’d say also fits the description - in which you really commit patches instead of whole trees and patches are pretend. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • I'm daily driving Jujutsu, and maybe you should too
    Simplicity is in the eye of the beholder but Pijul[0] claims to be "easy to learn and use". [0] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: If you were rewriting Emacs from scratch, what would you do differently?
    >> see jujutsu nowadays I'm looking at pijul.. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Jujutsu: A Next Generation Replacement for Git
    How does this compare to Pijul[1]? [1] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Local First, Forever
    Using theory of patches would better compliment the current approach. Integrating a scm such as https://pijul.org or atleast the underlying tech would allow for better conflict resolutions. Transferring patches should also allow for more efficient use of io. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Xfce-Terminal and Pijul, you can also consider the following products

Kitty terminal - Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

WindTerm - WindTerm is a terminal emulator application that is used in cross-platforms such as SSH, Sftp, Shell, Telnet, and serial terminal and allows you to use the mouse to conduct any operation on its interface.

darcs - Darcs is an advanced revision control system, for source code or other files.

ST - Simple Terminal - st is a simple terminal implementation for X.

Gitless - Gitless is an experimental version control system built on top of Git.