Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ST - Simple Terminal VS Pijul

Compare ST - Simple Terminal VS Pijul and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

ST - Simple Terminal logo ST - Simple Terminal

st is a simple terminal implementation for X.

Pijul logo Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
  • ST - Simple Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-28
  • Pijul Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

ST - Simple Terminal features and specs

  • Lightweight
    ST is designed to be extremely lightweight, making it fast and responsive even on older machines.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    ST aims to minimize dependencies, which simplifies installation and reduces potential for conflicts with other software.
  • Customizability
    ST's source code is intended to be modified by users to fit their needs, allowing deep personalization and optimization.
  • Simplicity
    ST follows the Suckless philosophy of simplicity, providing essential features without unnecessary bloat.
  • Open Source
    ST is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the development of the software.

Possible disadvantages of ST - Simple Terminal

  • Limited Features
    Due to its minimalist design, ST lacks some advanced features found in other terminals, which might be essential for certain users.
  • Manual Configuration
    ST requires users to modify its source code for configuration, which can be a barrier for those unfamiliar with programming.
  • Lack of Pre-built Binaries
    ST typically needs to be compiled from source, which can be inconvenient compared to using package managers with pre-built binaries.
  • Basic Look and Feel
    The focus on minimalism means ST does not provide out-of-the-box eye candy or extensive customization of appearance through simple configuration files.
  • Community Size
    ST has a smaller community compared to more popular terminals, potentially making it harder to find support or plugins for additional functionality.

Pijul features and specs

  • Patch-Based System
    Pijul is based on a true patch-based model, where changes are stored as patches. This allows for more granular control and the ability to handle conflicts more naturally than in traditional version control systems.
  • Commute-ability
    Pijul allows patches to commute, meaning they can be rearranged freely as long as they do not directly conflict with each other. This can make collaboration simpler as developers can work in parallel seamlessly.
  • Conflict Resolution
    The system offers more sophisticated conflict resolution mechanisms, enabling users to resolve conflicts at the patch level rather than entire commits, making it easier to pinpoint and address issues.
  • Mathematical Foundations
    Pijul is based on a strong theoretical foundation (Darcs theory) that provides a rigorous mathematical framework for version control logic, offering a structured and reliable approach to merging and branching.
  • Branching and Merging
    Branching and merging in Pijul are straightforward and intuitive, eliminating many of the complexities associated with these processes in other systems.

Possible disadvantages of Pijul

  • Maturity and Adoption
    As a relatively new system, Pijul may not be as mature as other VCS solutions like Git, possibly leading to a lack of community support, plugins, and resources.
  • Tooling
    The ecosystem around Pijul, including integrations with other tools like IDEs and CI/CD systems, is still in development, potentially complicating its use in professional environments.
  • Learning Curve
    The patch-based approach and the principles behind Pijul might be unfamiliar to users accustomed to traditional version control systems, resulting in a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance
    For very large repositories or numerous patches, performance could potentially be an issue due to the complexity of operations on patches, though active improvements are being made.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    The community and ecosystem around Pijul are smaller compared to more established version control systems, which may hinder the availability of guides, plug-ins, or extensions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ST - Simple Terminal and Pijul)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Git
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ST - Simple Terminal and Pijul. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ST - Simple Terminal and Pijul

ST - Simple Terminal Reviews

The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The st or Simple Terminal emulator gives you precisely what you ask for. ” A simple terminal emulator to interact with your Linux distro.”
Top 14 Terminal Emulators for Linux (With Extra Features or Amazing Looks)
Simple Terminal or popularly known as st is an alternative for users who dislike bloated terminal emulators like xterm or rxvt.
Source: itsfoss.com

Pijul Reviews

We have no reviews of Pijul yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Pijul might be a bit more popular than ST - Simple Terminal. We know about 48 links to it since March 2021 and only 47 links to ST - Simple Terminal. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ST - Simple Terminal mentions (47)

  • Typing with Pleasure
    Whenever I switch to another dev's machine, usually running either jetbrains or vscode, I'm always astounded at how annoyed I find myself while typing on it due to the high latency on keystrokes. I'm blessed with ~subframe delay using [st](https://st.suckless.org/) and neovim, and now I don't know if I could ever go back to a "true" IDE for professional work. Just for kicks I've started work on my own text editor... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Preview images, videos, fonts, PDFs ... in Vifm.
    The terminal I am currently using is st but I have also tested this "Vifm" enhancement in kitty and alacritty. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: Which is the simplest terminal emulator able to run Vim?
    Perhaps st: https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Autodafe: "freeing your freeing your project from the clammy grip of autotools."
    > you need to "edit your makefile". That isn't going to work for distributions Is it not? [st] requires exactly that. And distros seem to have no issues shipping it. [st] https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Write Your Own Terminal
    Check out st[1] for a minimal terminal implementation. They also have user-submitted patches that you can apply to add desired functionality. [1] https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Pijul mentions (48)

  • Evo: Version control that works the way you think
    Obligatory link to https://pijul.org/ which I’d say also fits the description - in which you really commit patches instead of whole trees and patches are pretend. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • I'm daily driving Jujutsu, and maybe you should too
    Simplicity is in the eye of the beholder but Pijul[0] claims to be "easy to learn and use". [0] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: If you were rewriting Emacs from scratch, what would you do differently?
    >> see jujutsu nowadays I'm looking at pijul.. https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Jujutsu: A Next Generation Replacement for Git
    How does this compare to Pijul[1]? [1] https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Local First, Forever
    Using theory of patches would better compliment the current approach. Integrating a scm such as https://pijul.org or atleast the underlying tech would allow for better conflict resolutions. Transferring patches should also allow for more efficient use of io. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ST - Simple Terminal and Pijul, you can also consider the following products

Kitty terminal - Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Konsole - Konsole is a free terminal emulator which is part of KDE Software Compilation.

darcs - Darcs is an advanced revision control system, for source code or other files.

WindTerm - WindTerm is a terminal emulator application that is used in cross-platforms such as SSH, Sftp, Shell, Telnet, and serial terminal and allows you to use the mouse to conduct any operation on its interface.

Gitless - Gitless is an experimental version control system built on top of Git.