Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

X (Twitter) VS Editor.js

Compare X (Twitter) VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

X (Twitter) logo X (Twitter)

Connect with your friends and other fascinating people. Get in-the-moment updates on the things that interest you. And watch events unfold, in real time, from every angle.

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
  • X (Twitter) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-08
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

X (Twitter) features and specs

  • Real-Time Updates
    X (formerly Twitter) allows users to receive and share information instantly, making it ideal for breaking news and real-time event updates.
  • Wide Reach
    With millions of active users globally, X provides an extensive platform for messages to reach a large and diverse audience.
  • Engagement Tools
    Features like retweets, replies, likes, and polls enable robust interaction and engagement with content.
  • Hashtags
    Hashtags facilitate easy categorization and searchability of tweets, making it simpler for users to find and connect over common interests.
  • Influencer and Celebrity Presence
    Many influencers, celebrities, and public figures are active on X, providing a unique opportunity for fans to engage with them directly.

Possible disadvantages of X (Twitter)

  • Limited Character Count
    The platform's character limit restricts the depth and complexity of messages that can be conveyed in a single tweet.
  • Misinformation
    Due to the speed and volume of content, X is susceptible to the rapid spread of false or misleading information.
  • Trolling and Harassment
    The platform can sometimes be a breeding ground for negative behavior, including trolling, harassment, and cyberbullying.
  • Privacy Concerns
    There are ongoing concerns about user privacy and data security, including the potential misuse of personal information.
  • Algorithmic Bias
    X's algorithm can sometimes prioritize sensational or controversial content, potentially skewing user perspectives and limiting the visibility of diverse viewpoints.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

X (Twitter) videos

+ Add

Twitter is still not a nice place: Year in Review

More videos:

  • Review - Stupid Zombies for Android Review by Androinica.com
  • Tutorial - How To Create Logos In Discord With Painter Bot?
  • Review - JSF ITF F-35 2015 Year In Review
  • Review - Apple iPad Pro For Coding | Carnets - Jupyter
  • Review - LEGATALK Explainer - EN
  • Review - Origami spaceship (Flashfox) review
  • Review - I Mastered The HQ Trivia App

Editor.js videos

+ Add

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to X (Twitter) and Editor.js)

X (Twitter)

Editor.js

Social Networks
100 100%
Social Networks
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Social Network
100 100%
Social Network
0% 0
Rich Text Editor
0 0%
Rich Text Editor
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using X (Twitter) and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare X (Twitter) and Editor.js

X (Twitter) Reviews

  1. CaptainJ

    Pretty nice app to share and to see how the people share the thoughts here

    👍 Pros:    Straightforward|Easy user interface|Information is easily accessible
    👎 Cons:    Can't attach a video file to your post
Top 12 Alternative Social Media Platform to Consider: An Overview
Imagine a Twitter fuelled by independent communities, not a tech giant. That's Mastodon. It's not one platform, but a network of servers, each with its own vibe, from artists and journalists to cat lovers and techies. You choose your server, connect across them, and post "toots" with longer text, images, and videos. Think open-source Twitter with more freedom and...
Source: www.theknowledgeacademy.com
The 7 Best Facebook Alternatives in 2024
News stories almost always break on this platform before Facebook and other sites. It also provides users the rare opportunity to interact with editors and journalists directly due to the high number of media personnel using the service. X may not be great for catching up with family members, but it can’t be topped for staying up-to-date on the news.
Source: www.lifewire.com
The 10 Best Twitter Alternatives if You’re Thinking of Quitting X
However, the segmented nature of its network means it can take time to find and build your niche, and it won’t have the immediate, global reach of Twitter. Regarding features, Mastodon mirrors Twitter with timelines and @mentions, but it’s ad-free.
Source: smartblogger.com
4 Twitter alternatives for brands considering leaving Twitter in 2024
If you do decide to leave Twitter, it's worth figuring out where to go. You still have Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn, but they're not really alternatives to Twitter. I asked some folks who manage brand social media accounts for their thoughts on Twitter alternatives, and these are the options that seem to be the most promising.
Source: zapier.com
Alternatives to Deferendum
Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and Quora: While these social media platforms provide opportunities for discussion and debate, Deferendum offers a more structured approach to group decision-making. Deferendum allows members to focus on specific problems and solutions, and provides a transparent process for voting and decision-making.
Source: deferendum.com

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, X (Twitter) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 893 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

X (Twitter) mentions (893)

  • Where can I get Grok 3? What You Need to Know
    For persistent issues, consult the help sections on x.com. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to scrape Bluesky with Python
    Bluesky is an emerging social network developed by former members of the Twitter(now X) development team. The platform has been showing significant growth recently, reaching 140.3 million visits according to SimilarWeb. Like X, luesky generates a vast amount of data that can be used for analysis. In this article, we’ll explore how to collect this data using Crawlee for Python. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Is X.com's (Twitter) Tor Broken?
    The preferred TOR location for X.com (twitter) has a broken cert (expired 2023) and returns 503 for all requests. Anyone know who to reach to get this fixed? From https://x.com/ :
    - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Create your own Censorship-Resistant Links for X and More!
    Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) can block or censor links to certain sites like they recently did to Signal.me, even when those links contain important information. A link shortener or redirect may work in the short term, but sites like Bitly and TinyURL create new single points of failure when platforms block them instead. What we want to do instead is leverage unique domains, like one you may already own for... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Deploying Flask-based Microservices on AWS with ECS Service Connect
    Sharing the video(s) or channel on any platform (reddit, twitter (or X I guess), discord, LinkedIn, etc.). - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Editor.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Editor.js yet. Tracking of Editor.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing X (Twitter) and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

Facebook - Connect with friends, family and other people you know. Share photos and videos, send messages and get updates.

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Mastodon - Mastodon is a decentralized, open source social network. This is just one part of the network, run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome!

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Reddit - Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. Get a constantly updating feed of breaking news, fun stories, pics, memes, and videos just for you.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

Loading...