Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

WPMU DEV VS Webpacker

Compare WPMU DEV VS Webpacker and see what are their differences

UserGuiding
Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

WPMU DEV logo WPMU DEV

WPMU offers WordPress Plugins, WordPress Themes, WordPress Multisite and BuddyPress Plugins and Themes.

Webpacker logo Webpacker

Use Webpack to manage app-like JavaScript modules in Rails - rails/webpacker
  • WPMU DEV Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • Webpacker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27

WPMU DEV features and specs

  • Comprehensive Plugin Suite
    WPMU DEV provides a wide range of premium plugins that cover various aspects of website management, including SEO, security, performance optimization, and more. This can save users from having to purchase multiple separate plugins.
  • 24/7 Support
    Users have access to around-the-clock support from WordPress experts, which is extremely helpful for resolving issues quickly and effectively.
  • Managed Hosting
    WPMU DEV offers high-quality managed WordPress hosting that includes features like automated backups, security, and performance enhancements.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform is designed to be user-friendly, making it accessible to both beginners and experienced users. The dashboard is intuitive, and it simplifies the process of managing multiple WordPress sites.
  • Automatic Updates
    Plugins provided by WPMU DEV are regularly updated automatically, ensuring that users always have the latest features and security patches.

Possible disadvantages of WPMU DEV

  • Cost
    The subscription fee can be relatively high compared to purchasing individual plugins elsewhere, which might be a concern for smaller businesses or individual site owners.
  • Overwhelming for Beginners
    The comprehensive nature of the platform can be overwhelming for beginners who may not need all the features provided. This could make the onboarding process longer and more complicated.
  • Limited Customization
    While the plugins and hosting solutions are robust, they may not be as customizable as some developers might like. Advanced users who require specific custom features might find the options limiting.
  • Dependency on Service
    Relying heavily on WPMU DEV means that if the service encounters issues or you decide to switch, migrating all your sites and dependencies can be challenging.

Webpacker features and specs

  • Modern JavaScript Features
    Webpacker allows Rails applications to utilize modern JavaScript features and tools, such as ES6 syntax, JSX, and TypeScript, thereby enhancing the developer experience and code quality.
  • Asset Bundling
    It efficiently bundles multiple JavaScript files into a single package, reducing load times and improving performance by minimizing the number of HTTP requests.
  • Integration with Rails
    As an official Rails library, Webpacker integrates seamlessly with the Rails framework, ensuring that front-end builds are consistent and easier to manage alongside Ruby on Rails projects.
  • Configurable
    Provides a highly configurable environment, allowing developers to customize their JavaScript and asset builds extensively to meet specific project needs.
  • Community Support
    Being part of the Rails ecosystem, Webpacker benefits from an extensive community support, with a wealth of third-party resources, documentation, and plugins available.

Possible disadvantages of Webpacker

  • Complexity
    Webpacker can introduce additional complexity, especially for developers not familiar with JavaScript tooling or the webpack configuration, which can lead to a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction and tooling required by Webpacker can add performance overhead during development with slower compilation and building times compared to simpler asset management solutions.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies can become burdensome as Webpacker requires handling both the Ruby Gems and the JavaScript packages through yarn or npm, increasing maintenance efforts.
  • Migration Path
    As newer tools and techniques emerge, moving away from Webpacker could require significant refactoring efforts, especially for applications with extensive custom configurations.
  • Deprecated Status
    Webpacker is no longer the recommended default for new Rails applications starting from Rails 7, which now prefers using esbuild or importmaps, potentially affecting its long-term viability.

WPMU DEV videos

+ Add

WPMU Dev, Reviews and Having your Views Challenged

More videos:

  • Review - SmartCrawl SEO Tool 2019 Review - Wordpress Plugin Walkthrough and Review WPMU Dev
  • Review - WPMU DEV Is Your All-In-One WordPress Platform

Webpacker videos

+ Add

RailsConf 2020 CE - Webpacker, It-Just-Works, But How? by Justin Gordon

More videos:

  • Review - Should you use React with Webpacker in your Rails project? Rails MVC vs Single Page App (SPA)!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WPMU DEV and Webpacker)

WPMU DEV

Webpacker

Ad Servers
100 100%
Ad Servers
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
Web Application Bundler
100% 100
Ad Serving
100 100%
Ad Serving
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WPMU DEV and Webpacker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpacker should be more popular than WPMU DEV. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WPMU DEV mentions (7)

  • Cost effective SSO options for central management of users and 70+ sites
    Highly recommend https://wpmudev.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • New multilanguage web
    WPMUDEV is a plugin developer and hosting provider, you're probably thinking of WPML. Source: about 2 years ago
  • [Hiring Latin America] Support Superhero - PHP | CSS | MySQL | HTML | WordPress
    Stop dreaming about tomorrow; start making a difference today. Join our team at WPMU DEV and be the hero you’ve always known yourself to be! Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How Do Guys show Your work to potential clients?
    A great resource for hosting multisites is WPMUDev since they support it on all their hosting tiers and comes with a wildcard SSL cert for HTTPS on all your sites. If you haven't set up a multisite before, I highly recommend going with WPMUDev since their support team will literally just do all the work of setting it up for you if needed. Source: about 3 years ago
  • User uploaded content
    I use Forminator by WPMU DEV. Its free plan allows us to add "upload file" block. But, yeah, it's still vulnerable in case someone upload malicious file via it. Forminator can be combined with Akismet & Captcha (to block spam bot), and WPMU DEV also has security plugin named Defender. And lots of good hosting includes ImunivyAV/360 into FTP. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Webpacker mentions (17)

  • React + Ruby on Rails without any gems
    We will use Webpacker or JavaScript compiler and assets management. By following the webpacker installation guide, let’s add Webpacker and React to our application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Collecting JavaScript code coverage with Capybara in Ruby on Rails application
    For example, there is a Ruby on Rails application that uses Webpacker and has JavaScript files that are covered by the system tests. Capybara is used as the system testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Asset Pipeline JS Migration
    Using Webpacker in Rails provides several advantages over the traditional asset pipeline. First, Webpacker uses JavaScript modules, which allows for better code organization and improved code reusability. Second, it offers modern frontend build tools, such as Babel and PostCSS, for transforming and compiling assets. Third, it provides faster build times and faster runtime performance through code splitting and... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Thank you Webpacker, Goodbye Webpacker
    This article is replace Webpacker with Simpacker and webpack. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How to setup ruby on rails + Angular
    In ruby ​​on rails 7 what is the best way to properly install Angular because I can't find any documentation about it. The only tutorial that exists uses webpacker (https://github.com/rails/webpacker) but unfortunately it is no longer supported and no longer up to date in terms of security. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WPMU DEV and Webpacker, you can also consider the following products

MAMP - MAMP is the abbreviation for Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. It is a reliable application with its four components that allows you to access the local PHP server as well as the database server (SQL).

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

.NET - .NET is a free, cross-platform, open source developer platform for building many different types of applications.

Turbolinks - Turbolinks makes navigating your web application faster

Firefox Developer Edition - Built for those who build the Web. The only browser made for developers.

Pingy CLI - Making Modern Websites Should Be Easier. Pingy is Here To Help.

Loading...