Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pixi.js VS WOW.js

Compare Pixi.js VS WOW.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

WOW.js logo WOW.js

Animate elements on-scroll to catch attention. Such Magic.
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14
  • WOW.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-11

Pixi.js features and specs

  • High Performance
    Pixi.js utilizes WebGL to deliver high-performance rendering, which is ideal for building fast and responsive web applications and games.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, allowing developers to build applications that work seamlessly across different devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pixi.js has comprehensive and well-documented resources that help developers understand how to use the library effectively, including tutorials and examples.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library comes with a wide range of features such as textures, sprites, and filters, enabling developers to create visually complex and appealing content.
  • Active Community
    Pixi.js benefits from a large and active community, which means frequent updates, a wealth of plugins, and abundant community support.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Pixi.js is free to use and modify, making it accessible to developers with different levels of expertise and budgets.

Possible disadvantages of Pixi.js

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, beginners may find Pixi.js challenging to learn and integrate into their projects because of its extensive feature set.
  • WebGL Dependencies
    While WebGL provides high performance, it can also cause compatibility issues on older devices or browsers that do not fully support WebGL.
  • Limited 3D Capabilities
    Pixi.js is primarily a 2D rendering engine, so it may not be suitable for projects that require advanced 3D graphics and interactions.
  • Size
    Compared to simpler libraries, Pixi.js can be relatively large in terms of file size, which could impact the loading times of web applications, especially on slower networks.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in Pixi.js can be complex, especially in large applications, as it often involves low-level graphics operations and WebGL debugging tools.

WOW.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WOW.js is simple to implement. By linking the library and adding a few data attributes, users can quickly set up animations on scroll without extensive coding.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The library is designed to work across various browsers, ensuring a consistent animation experience for most users.
  • Lightweight
    WOW.js is a small library that adds minimal weight to web pages, making it an ideal choice for developers looking to enhance user experience without slowing down page load times.
  • Extensive Animation Options
    With WOW.js, there are numerous animation effects available, allowing developers to apply dynamic and varied animations easily.

Possible disadvantages of WOW.js

  • Limited Customization
    While WOW.js offers a variety of animations, deeply customizing these effects may require additional code or integration with other libraries.
  • Dependency on Animate.css
    WOW.js relies on Animate.css for animations, which means developers must include both libraries for full functionality.
  • Lacks Updates and Support
    The library is not frequently updated, and there may be limited community support compared to more widely used libraries.
  • Performance Issues on Heavy Pages
    On pages with numerous animations or complex content, WOW.js might impact performance, leading to jittery or delayed animations.

Pixi.js videos

PixiJS Crash Course

WOW.js videos

Hướng dẫn sử dụng Animation.css và WOW.js cho website

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pixi.js and WOW.js)
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Animation
0 0%
100% 100
Charting Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
3D
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pixi.js and WOW.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pixi.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 4 years ago

WOW.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WOW.js yet. Tracking of WOW.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pixi.js and WOW.js, you can also consider the following products

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Lax.js - Create beautiful & smooth animations when you scroll

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

ScrollMagic - The jQuery plugin for magical scroll interactions.

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

ScrollReveal - ScrollReveal is a tool to add scroll animations for web and mobile browsers.