Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WorkOS VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Compare WorkOS VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and see what are their differences

WorkOS logo WorkOS

Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.
  • WorkOS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

WorkOS features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    WorkOS provides straightforward integration for developers with well-documented APIs and SDKs, allowing organizations to incorporate enterprise-ready features into their applications quickly.
  • Security and Compliance
    It offers built-in security and compliance features such as single sign-on (SSO), directory sync, and audit logs, helping businesses meet regulatory requirements with ease.
  • Scalability
    WorkOS is designed to scale with your business, providing the flexibility to add more users and features as your application grows.
  • Time Efficiency
    By providing pre-built solutions for complex enterprise functions, WorkOS saves developers time and resources they would spend building these features from scratch.
  • Broad Compatibility
    The platform supports a wide range of identity providers, making it compatible with many different enterprise environments.

Possible disadvantages of WorkOS

  • Cost
    While WorkOS offers a lot of features, the associated costs might be high for startups and small businesses.
  • Dependency on Third-party
    Relying on WorkOS for critical components means entrusting a third-party service, which can lead to challenges if service outages or changes occur.
  • Complexity for Smaller Use Cases
    For companies with simpler access management needs, the comprehensive features provided by WorkOS might be more than necessary, leading to potential over-engineering.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite robust documentation, there might be a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with integrating third-party enterprise solutions.
  • Potential Vendor Lock-in
    As with any third-party service, there can be concerns about vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch providers once integrated deeply.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

WorkOS videos

Add SSO to your Next.js app using WorkOS in 7 minutes

More videos:

  • Review - Introducing Admin Portal (by WorkOS)

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WorkOS and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
Identity Provider
67 67%
33% 33
Two Factor Authentication

User comments

Share your experience with using WorkOS and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WorkOS and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

WorkOS Reviews

Top 10 Best SAML Identity Providers List for SSO (Pros and Cons)
Just launched in 2018, and WorkOS is already well liked by many enterprises and IT developers. The all in one solution boasts Enterprise SSO and supports all OIDC and SAML providers right out of the box.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WorkOS should be more popular than Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WorkOS mentions (12)

  • What is SCIM Provisioning: In-Depth Guide [2024]
    WorkOS aims to provide enterprise-grade identity management solutions for your app to help you ship without needing extensive resources or time. It includes a Directory Sync to help you 'build a frictionless user provisioning and deprovisioning workflow for your organization.'. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Why SMBs Don't Deploy SSO
    Full disclosure: I work at WorkOS (https://workos.com/), we provide SSO (among other things) as a service. I glanced through the report and it comes to the normal conclusion that SSO is hard and expensive to get right. Do SMBs focus on providing value to their customers in the problem space that they are experts at or do they spend months just getting sign-in working? Yeah I get the concern about the "SSO tax" but... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Migrating from Radix to React Aria: Enhancing Accessibility and UX at Argos
    React Aria underpins React Spectrum, Adobe's design system used for web applications like Photoshop. Adobe's significant investment in this technology ensures long-term support and reliability. While Ariakit is excellent and Diego Haz is a talented developer, the lack of corporate backing poses sustainability risks. The project could halt if the developer decides to stop, and there's a higher risk of breaking... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Show HN: Auth0 OSS alternative Ory Kratos now with passwordless and SMS support
    Have you tried WorkOS? It’s built for exactly this, with native support for SAML and SCIM. https://workos.com/ I’m the founder. Would love to hear your feedback and happy to answer questions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • How Open ID Connect Works
    Have you tried WorkOS? (I work there.) Makes it super easy to add SAML/SCIM to your app. https://workos.com/ We also recently launched https://www.authkit.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WorkOS and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, you can also consider the following products

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

Frontegg - Elegant user management, tailor-made for B2B SaaS

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Descope - Drag-and-drop authentication for your app

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.