Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Working Copy VS Git History

Compare Working Copy VS Git History and see what are their differences

Working Copy logo Working Copy

The powerful Git client for iOS

Git History logo Git History

Quickly browse the history of any GitHub file Replace github.com with github.githistory.xyz in any file url.
  • Working Copy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23
  • Git History Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

Working Copy features and specs

  • User Interface
    Working Copy features an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes navigating through repositories, committing changes, and pushing updates seamless even for beginners.
  • File Management
    It offers robust file management capabilities, allowing users to easily view, edit, and manage files directly within the app, a crucial feature for developers on the go.
  • Integration
    Working Copy integrates well with other iOS apps and services, enabling smooth workflow transitions between different tools and platforms.
  • Support for Multiple Repositories
    The app supports multiple repositories, which is beneficial for developers who work on various projects simultaneously.
  • Offline Capabilities
    Working Copy allows users to work offline with local repositories, syncing changes when back online, enabling productivity in environments without internet access.
  • SSH Key Management
    It includes robust SSH key management, ensuring secure and streamlined authentication for remote repository access.

Possible disadvantages of Working Copy

  • Cost
    While the basic features are free, some advanced functionalities require a paid subscription, which might be a drawback for budget-conscious users.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the abundance of features can be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Platform
    The app is available exclusively for iOS, which restricts accessibility for developers who use other platforms like Android or Windows.
  • Performance with Large Repositories
    Some users report performance issues when handling very large repositories, affecting the app's efficiency in such scenarios.
  • Editing Capabilities
    While it offers basic editing functionalities, Working Copy lacks some of the more advanced code editing features found in dedicated code editors.

Git History features and specs

  • Easy Visualization
    Git History provides an intuitive interface to visualize the commit history of a Git repository, making it easier to understand the project's development timeline.
  • Interactive Features
    The tool offers interactive features, such as the ability to click on specific commits to see detailed information, including lines of code changed, author, and timestamps.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, Git History does not require any installation, allowing users to access it from any device with a web browser.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Git History allows developers to contribute improvements or customize the tool according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Git History

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to robust Git clients, Git History may lack some advanced features such as rebasing or detailed branch management.
  • Performance Issues
    For large repositories, Git History might suffer from performance lags or may not handle the complexity efficiently.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    The tool requires repositories to be hosted on GitHub, limiting its use for repositories hosted on other platforms.
  • Security Concerns
    Using a web-based tool means potential exposure to security vulnerabilities, particularly if sensitive information is being accessed.

Working Copy videos

Using Git on iPad with Textastic and Working Copy

More videos:

  • Review - Obsidian: Capture on iOS with Drafts and Working Copy - Effective Remote Work

Git History videos

How to view git history of files in vscode | git commit history and local history without extension

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Working Copy and Git History)
Git
81 81%
19% 19
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Working Copy and Git History. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Working Copy should be more popular than Git History. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Working Copy mentions (18)

  • 37signals Introduces Once – One time payment software
    Even better is the licensing model where you can keep using the version as-is after the subscription ends. You just don't get any new features. It's even possible to do on iOS, as Working Copy [0] is doing it. (You also get all the bug fixes and stuff, only new features are behind a flag that requires you to purchase another year of updates. I would also argue that Working Copy specifically is too cheap, but I... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How I set up an almost fully automatic free Sync between Win, Android, iOS using Git.
    Yeah, Working Copy is a proper Git front-end which helps do safe syncing, via features such as:. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [Newbie] How could I prevent git conflicts and make this system better?
    So I have a laptop and a iPhone. On laptop I have the Obsidian.md desktop app, on iPhone I have the app and Working Copy app too. This is all for syncing my notes. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Jot: Rapid note management for the terminal, inspired by Obsidian
    > It uses the same format of storage as Obsidian... Can Obsidian and Jot co-mingle in the same vault? I use Obsidian and am very happy with the git plugin[0] and Working Copy(iOS)[1] for keeping things automatically synced between my phone and desktop(s). Often I find myself dumping notes into random places from the terminal; feeding markdown via pipes. But I then have to remember to collect these artifacts and... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Are there any good git viewers/browsers for iOS?
    This is the only one I've heard people use: https://workingcopyapp.com/. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

Git History mentions (2)

  • Github on Steroids
    Sometime you want to know what changes have been made to a file. Github do have a history button for a file, but In my opinion, it's not really detail and still have to click a a lot of things. Luckily there is another awesome tool Git History. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Scrollycoding – A new way to write code walkthroughs
    I also have this project http://githistory.xyz/, I want to make a new version of it specific for tutorials, using commit messages or git notes to display a better description of each step. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Working Copy and Git History, you can also consider the following products

CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

Waydev - Waydev analyzes your codebase from Github, Gitlab, Azure DevOps & Bitbucket to help you bring out the best in your engineers work.

Git2Go - The Git client for iPhone and iPad you always wanted

Git analytics - for software developers, teams, and open-source communities

Git Flow - Git Flow is a very self-explanatory free software workflow for managing Git branches.

Screenful Metrics for GitHub - Analytics for GitHub Issues