Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WikiLinks VS Wikipedia

Compare WikiLinks VS Wikipedia and see what are their differences

WikiLinks logo WikiLinks

Explore Wikipedia through a media-packed, mind-mapping experience.

Wikipedia logo Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
  • WikiLinks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-12
  • Wikipedia Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

WikiLinks features and specs

  • Comprehensive Resource
    WikiLinks provides a vast repository of information drawn from Wikipedia, offering users access to a wide range of topics in a centralized location.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform is designed to be user-friendly, allowing easy navigation through its content and enhancing the user experience.
  • Regular Updates
    Since it relies on Wikipedia, the site benefits from the constant updates and improvements made by Wikipedia's large community of contributors.
  • Free Access
    Like Wikipedia, WikiLinks offers free access to its content, making knowledge available to anyone with an internet connection.

Possible disadvantages of WikiLinks

  • Reliance on Wikipedia
    Since WikiLinks is based on Wikipedia content, it inherits the same reliability issues, such as potential inaccuracies due to user-generated content.
  • Limited Original Content
    WikiLinks may lack original content or insights, as it primarily aggregates existing Wikipedia articles rather than creating new content.
  • Possible Redundancy
    Users familiar with Wikipedia might find WikiLinks redundant, preferring to go directly to the primary source for comprehensive research.
  • Ads and Sponsorships
    The platform may rely on advertisements or sponsorships for revenue, which could detract from the user experience by introducing distractions or biased content.

Wikipedia features and specs

  • Comprehensive Coverage
    Wikipedia provides information on an enormous range of topics, often in great detail. This makes it an invaluable resource for quick fact-checking, general research, and gaining a surface-level understanding of a subject.
  • Free Access
    Wikipedia is free to use for anyone with internet access, reducing barriers to information and supporting educational equality.
  • Collaborative Editing
    Articles on Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, allowing for a collaborative and dynamic creation and updating process. This can lead to quick corrections and diverse perspectives.
  • Citations and Sources
    Many articles on Wikipedia include citations and references to external sources, which can be useful for further research and verification of the information provided.
  • Multilingual
    Wikipedia is available in numerous languages, which helps make information accessible to a global audience.

Possible disadvantages of Wikipedia

  • Potential for Vandalism
    Because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, there's a potential for vandalism or the introduction of incorrect information, which can affect the reliability of some articles.
  • Citation Quality
    The quality and reliability of cited sources in Wikipedia articles can vary, and some articles may cite unreliable or biased sources.
  • Subjectivity and Bias
    Despite efforts to maintain neutrality, some articles may contain subjective viewpoints or bias, reflecting the opinions of their contributors.
  • Incomplete Information
    Not all topics are covered equally well on Wikipedia. Lesser-known or more recent topics may have sparse or poorly developed entries.
  • Misleading Editing Practices
    There can be instances where experienced editors dominate the editing process, potentially leading to gatekeeping and exclusion of alternative perspectives or newer editors.

WikiLinks videos

Wikilinks: Smart Wikipedia Reader for iPhone & iPad

Wikipedia videos

Wikipedia The Game | Beer and Board Games

More videos:

  • Review - Using Wikipedia on an iPod Mini
  • Review - I Don't Use or Trust Wikipedia Anymore.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WikiLinks and Wikipedia)
Content Collaboration
7 7%
93% 93
Wikis And Discussion Spaces
Note Taking
0 0%
100% 100
Education
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using WikiLinks and Wikipedia. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WikiLinks and Wikipedia

WikiLinks Reviews

We have no reviews of WikiLinks yet.
Be the first one to post

Wikipedia Reviews

17 open source wiki engine/software
MediaWiki is a free and open source server based wiki engine written in PHP developed by Wikipedia. MediaWiki is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation, that uses PHP to process and display data stored in its MySQL database. Pages use MediaWiki’s wiki-text format, so that users without knowledge of XHTML or CSS can edit pages easily...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wikipedia seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 127 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WikiLinks mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WikiLinks yet. Tracking of WikiLinks recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Wikipedia mentions (127)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WikiLinks and Wikipedia, you can also consider the following products

V for Wiki - A beautifully designed Wikipedia app for iOS

Fandom - The entertainment site where fans come first.

Wikiwand - A beautiful new interface to Wikipedia

Miraheze - Miraheze is a wiki farm (hosts wikis) for free and with no ads, it also provides custom domains...

WikiGalaxy - Explore wikipedia in 3d

Encyclopædia Britannica - Explore the fact-checked online encyclopedia from Encyclopaedia Britannica with hundreds of thousands of objective articles, biographies, videos, and images from experts.