Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

websocketd VS Svix

Compare websocketd VS Svix and see what are their differences

websocketd logo websocketd

Turn any program that uses STDIN/STDOUT into a WebSocket server. Like inetd, but for WebSockets.

Svix logo Svix

The enterprise ready webhooks service, open-source and in the cloud.
  • websocketd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-27
  • Svix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-13

Svix offers both an open source and hosted version of Webhooks as a Service. We make it extremely simple for API providers to offer a webhook service to their users without needing to design and maintain the complex infrastructure needed to deploy webhooks at scale.

Svix

Website
svix.com
$ Details
freemium
Platforms
Node JS Python Go Ruby JavaScript Java PHP

websocketd features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Websocketd is straightforward to use, turning any local executable into a WebSocket server. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Language Agnostic
    Since websocketd can wrap any executable, developers can use it with any programming language they prefer, allowing for flexibility in choosing the right tools for their projects.
  • Lightweight
    Websocketd is a lightweight tool with minimal overhead, making it ideal for projects that require efficient WebSocket communication without the need for a full-featured server.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The ease of setting up websocketd allows developers to quickly prototype WebSocket applications and test new ideas without significant investment in infrastructure.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, websocketd benefits from community contributions and transparency, ensuring continuous improvement and trustworthiness of the software.

Possible disadvantages of websocketd

  • Limited Features
    While its simplicity is an advantage, websocketd's feature set is minimal. It does not provide advanced capabilities such as authentication, performance monitoring, or compression.
  • Lack of Built-in Scalability
    Websocketd doesn't come with built-in support for high scalability or distributed systems, which can be a limitation for applications needing to handle a large number of simultaneous connections.
  • No Native HTTP Support
    Websocketd is focused solely on WebSockets, so it lacks native support for serving regular HTTP endpoints, which may necessitate additional infrastructure for projects requiring mixed communication.
  • Manual Process Management
    Developers have to handle process management manually, which includes ensuring the stability of wrapped programs and addressing issues that arise from resource limits.
  • Community Size
    Compared to more established tools, websocketd has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources in terms of documentation, tutorials, and community support.

Svix features and specs

  • Scalability
    Svix is designed to handle large volumes of webhooks efficiently, making it a suitable choice for businesses that expect to grow and require robust webhook delivery.
  • Security
    Svix offers security features such as HMAC signature verification and webhook replay protection, ensuring the integrity and safety of webhook communications.
  • Ease of Integration
    Svix provides SDKs and a simple API that make it easy to integrate with various systems, reducing the time and effort required for implementation.
  • Reliability
    Guarantees high delivery success rate due to features like retry mechanisms, which ensure webhooks are not lost or missed.
  • Monitoring and Debugging
    Offers comprehensive monitoring and debugging tools that allow developers to track and troubleshoot webhook events effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Svix

  • Cost
    For smaller businesses or projects with a limited budget, the cost of using Svix might be a limiting factor compared to open-source options.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Service
    Using Svix introduces a dependency on an external service provider, which could be a concern regarding data privacy and service availability.
  • Complexity for Simple Needs
    For use cases that require only basic webhook functionality, Svix might be overly complex, offering more features than necessary.

websocketd videos

No websocketd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Svix videos

Webhook Architecture Design

More videos:

  • Review - Are These Balisongs WORTH IT?? - Svix Zephyr & Gale REVIEW
  • Review - The Squid Triton KILLER?? - Svix Terra Balisong Review
  • Review - Svix Terra Review by Mr. RidonKuluous 🪄🪄

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to websocketd and Svix)
Developer Tools
33 33%
67% 67
APIs
25 25%
75% 75
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using websocketd and Svix. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, websocketd should be more popular than Svix. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

websocketd mentions (4)

  • ht: Headless Terminal
    Reminds me quite a bit of websocketd as well, which converts a stdin/stdout program to a websocket: http://websocketd.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Structured Logging with Slog
    I hadn't even considered collecting traces/spans in this way yet, and have taken the approach of "stuff outputting logs in JSON format to stderr/local file". I usually end up writing a (temporary, structured) log message with the relevant span tags, but wouldn't it would be much better to run the actual trace/span code and be able to verify it locally without the ad-hoc log message? The prototype I built is a web... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • WebSocket to TCP bridge for game servers? Alternative to websockify?
    I also used to use this (http://websocketd.com/) along with netcat(1) before just biting the bullet and writing my own websocket library for our server as we needed to scale up slightly. Source: over 2 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Http://websocketd.com/ (Runs command line C or C++ programs as websocket programs, similar to inetd / CGI). Source: over 3 years ago

Svix mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Plan Events Effortlessly – Free, No-Sign-Up Required Event Planning App
    Congrats on the launch, and let us know if you need help with that (https://svix.com). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Open-Source Webhooks Gateway for Platform Engineers
    Hello! Love it! How would you say you compare to and differentiate from https://svix.com? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing websocketd and Svix, you can also consider the following products

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

Webhook Wizard - Quickly build and manage Webhooks Webhook delivery with flexibility, reliability, monitoring and debugging.

soketi - Your simple, fast, and resilient open-source WS server.

Hookdeck - Hookdeck makes it simple to build and deploy reliable, testable, and debuggable applications that rely on webhooks.

BrainyCP - Multi-functional server hosting control panel for Linux

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.