Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WebSocket-Node VS JBoss

Compare WebSocket-Node VS JBoss and see what are their differences

WebSocket-Node logo WebSocket-Node

A WebSocket Implementation for Node.JS ( Draft -08 through the final RFC 6455 )

JBoss logo JBoss

JBoss is Red Hats Java EE 5-compliant (soon Java EE 6-compliant) application server.
  • WebSocket-Node Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18
  • JBoss Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17

WebSocket-Node features and specs

  • Simplicity
    WebSocket-Node provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API that allows developers to quickly set up WebSocket communication in Node.js.
  • Compliance
    It implements the WebSocket Protocol as outlined in RFC6455, ensuring compatibility with the standard WebSocket implementation.
  • Event-Driven
    Designed to leverage Node.js's event-driven architecture, allowing for efficient real-time data exchange.
  • Lightweight
    Being a lightweight library, it doesn't add significant overhead to applications, which is beneficial in terms of performance.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project available on GitHub, it has an active community that contributes to its improvement and maintenance.

Possible disadvantages of WebSocket-Node

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive libraries, WebSocket-Node might lack some advanced features or extensions that are available in more complete frameworks.
  • Maintenance
    Depending on community contributions for updates and fixes can lead to uncertainty in terms of long-term maintenance and support.
  • Scalability
    Handling a very large number of concurrent connections might require additional consideration and architecture adjustments, as it is fundamental.
  • Lack of Built-in Reconnection Logic
    The library does not include native support for automatic reconnection, which developers need to implement manually if needed.

JBoss features and specs

  • Open Source
    JBoss is an open-source application server, which means it's free to use, and its source code is available for customization according to specific project needs.
  • Java EE Compliance
    JBoss is fully compliant with Java EE specifications, ensuring compatibility and supporting enterprise-level applications with standardized components.
  • Community Support
    JBoss benefits from a large and active community, providing extensive documentation, forums, and shared knowledge to support developers.
  • Modular Architecture
    JBoss employs a modular architecture, allowing developers to select and use only the components needed, improving performance and resource utilization.
  • Red Hat Partnership
    Backed by Red Hat, JBoss has reliable support for enterprise customers and integrates well with other Red Hat products and services.

Possible disadvantages of JBoss

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of JBoss can be complex and time-consuming, especially for developers new to the platform.
  • Resource Intensive
    JBoss can require significant system resources, which might not be ideal for lightweight or less resource-rich environments.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive feature set and configurability, JBoss can present a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Performance Overhead
    Being a full-fledged enterprise solution, JBoss may introduce performance overhead in comparison to lighter weight server solutions for smaller projects.
  • Dependency on Java
    As a Java-based application server, JBoss depends heavily on Java technology, which could be limiting for projects looking at multi-language microservices architectures.

WebSocket-Node videos

No WebSocket-Node videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

JBoss videos

JBoss EAP - 50 JGroups Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Learn Going Under the Hood of JBoss in Java Development with Jboss App Server from GogoTraining
  • Review - What is Red Hat JBoss Middleware?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WebSocket-Node and JBoss)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Application Server
0 0%
100% 100
Renting
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WebSocket-Node and JBoss. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WebSocket-Node and JBoss, you can also consider the following products

gevent - gevent is a coroutine -based Python networking library that uses greenlet to provide a high-level...

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Lightstreamer - Lightstreamer is a server for delivering real-time messages to browser-based and mobile...

Payara Server - Payara Server is a fully supported, developer-friendly, open source application server. Innovative, cloud-native, optimized for production deployments. Jakarta EE & MicroProfile compatible.

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

Eclipse Jetty - Jetty is a highly scalable modular servlet engine and http server that natively supports many modern protocols like SPDY and WebSockets.