Software Alternatives & Reviews

WebdriverIO VS Tape

Compare WebdriverIO VS Tape and see what are their differences

WebdriverIO logo WebdriverIO

Webdriver module for Node.js. that makes it easier to write Selenium tests

Tape logo Tape

Easy, collaborative social video app
  • WebdriverIO Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Tape Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01

WebdriverIO videos

WebdriverIO Tutorial Series Review | #20

More videos:

  • Review - Test React Apps with WebdriverIO
  • Review - Get Started With WebdriverIO - WebdriverIO Wednesdays

Tape videos

Which Duct Tape Brand is the Best? Let's find out!

More videos:

  • Review - Alien Tape Review: Does This As Seen on TV Tape Work?
  • Review - Nano Tape Review: Put to the Test!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WebdriverIO and Tape)
Automated Testing
61 61%
39% 39
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WebdriverIO and Tape. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WebdriverIO and Tape

WebdriverIO Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
While WebDriverIO utilizes the Selenium WebDriver for cross-browser testing, it simplifies interaction by providing a more JavaScript-friendly API and a robust plugin system. This makes it more approachable for developers familiar with JavaScript ecosystems compared to the traditional, more language-agnostic Selenium WebDriver.
Source: bugbug.io

Tape Reviews

We have no reviews of Tape yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tape should be more popular than WebdriverIO. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WebdriverIO mentions (2)

  • Node.js Packages and Resources
    WebdriverIO - Automated testing based on the WebDriver protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Cross Browser Testing With WebDriverIO
    The WebDriverIO project is available on GitHub and the overall statistics speak a lot about the popularity of this JavaScript framework. It has more than 6.7K stars and the project has been forked around 1.9K times. As of writing this blog, the latest version of the WebDriverIO JavaScript framework is 7.7.2. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

Tape mentions (10)

  • Express API Testing
    Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Straight talk: Salary discussion thread
    OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Find component by display name when the component is stateless functional, with Enzyme
    Reactjs I have the following components: // Hello.jsexport default (React) => ({name}) => { return ( Hello {name ? Name : 'Stranger'}! )}// App.jsimport createHello from './Hello'export default (React) => () => { const Hello = createHello(React) const helloProps = { name: 'Jane' } return ( )}// index.jsimport React from 'react'import { render } from 'react-dom'import createApp from... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Tools for testing Functional Web Apps
    For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. Tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Chaijs.com just let their domain expire
    I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set. [1] https://github.com/avajs/ava [2] https://github.com/substack/tape [3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WebdriverIO and Tape, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Mocha - Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.

Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript

QUnit - What is QUnit? QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...