WebComponents.dev VS WebDen

How the tag name gets into your code can vary based on the method you are using to write your components. If you load up a few of the templates over on WebComponents.dev you'll see that many examples just use a string value typed into the define function directly. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

WebComponents.dev — In-browser IDE to code web components in isolation with 58 templates available, supporting stories and tests. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

We will show the benefits of Atomico through a comparison, we have used as a basis for this comparison the existing counter webcomponents in webcomponents.dev of Atomico, Lit, Preact and React as a base. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Unfortunately, I couldn't get this to work in the online LWC editor https://webcomponents.dev So assuming this also won't work in the shadow DOM enviroment of SF? Source: almost 2 years ago

WebComponentsDev have a lot of libraries and info (like codesandbox, but webcomponents land): Https://webcomponents.dev/. Source: about 2 years ago

Nice work! I wish I would have come across this sooner or I might not have started building https://webden.dev for the past year haha. PLAYCODE is definitely more robust as far as features (courses, virtual file system, pro version, users, node.js, transpiled projects, etc) but it's cool to see your big focus on speed. The rest of the ecosystem felt so heavy and bloated when I originally started looking. Also,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago