Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

W3M VS Garden (Clojure)

Compare W3M VS Garden (Clojure) and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

W3M logo W3M

w3m is a text-based web browser as well as a pager like ' ...

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.
  • W3M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-22
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

W3M features and specs

  • Lightweight
    W3M is a lightweight browser, making it suitable for systems with minimal resources, and performs well even on older hardware.
  • Text-based
    As a text-based browser, W3M is useful for accessing web content via command-line interfaces, which can be beneficial for users who prefer non-GUI environments.
  • Fast Performance
    Due to its minimalistic design, W3M provides fast browsing experiences, especially when handling simple webpages or when operating over slow connections.
  • Keyboard Navigation
    W3M allows efficient browsing using keyboard shortcuts, which can enhance productivity for users who master these controls.
  • Inline Image Support
    W3M supports the display of inline images when combined with certain terminal emulators, offering better multimedia support compared to some other text-based browsers.

Possible disadvantages of W3M

  • Limited Modern Web Support
    W3M struggles with rendering complex websites that rely heavily on JavaScript and modern web technologies, limiting its usability on many current sites.
  • User Interface
    The text-based user interface can be difficult for new users to adapt to, especially those accustomed to graphical web browsers.
  • Limited Interactivity
    Due to its text-based nature, W3M has limited support for interactive web features, which can impede full functionality on interactive pages.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The reliance on keyboard shortcuts and the lack of a GUI can present a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with text-based navigation.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    W3M requires a terminal interface, which might not be as appealing or accessible for users used to graphical environments.

Garden (Clojure) features and specs

  • Clojure Interoperability
    Garden leverages Clojure's syntax and functional programming paradigms, enabling seamless integration with Clojure applications and allowing developers to utilize Clojure's features, such as macros and immutable data structures.
  • Powerful Abstraction
    Garden provides a high-level abstraction for styling, which allows developers to compose styles dynamically and programmatically. This can lead to more maintainable and reusable code compared to traditional CSS.
  • Live Reloading
    Garden integrates well with tools like Figwheel for hot reloading, allowing developers to see changes in styles immediately without refreshing the browser, which boosts productivity.
  • Code as Data
    By treating CSS as data, Garden allows for the manipulation and transformation of styles with the full power of Clojure's data processing capabilities, enabling complex style logic that would be cumbersome in vanilla CSS.

Possible disadvantages of Garden (Clojure)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with Clojure, the syntax and concepts might present a barrier to entry, requiring a learning period before being able to effectively use Garden.
  • Limited Adoption
    As a niche tool within the Clojure ecosystem, Garden has a smaller user base and community compared to more mainstream CSS preprocessors like SASS or LESS, which can limit the availability of community resources and plugins.
  • Performance Overhead
    Generating styles dynamically might add to the initial rendering time compared to static style sheets, which can be a concern for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Debugging Complexity
    The abstraction and dynamic nature of Garden can make debugging CSS issues more complex, as it is not as straightforward as inspecting static CSS rules in browser developer tools.

W3M videos

Terminal-based Web Browsing with w3m - Lunduke Show

More videos:

  • Review - nVLC Browser Extension for W3M - Linux TUI
  • Review - w3m-img -- View Images in the Console - Linux CLI

Garden (Clojure) videos

No Garden (Clojure) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to W3M and Garden (Clojure))
Web Browsers
100 100%
0% 0
CSS Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Rental Property Management
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using W3M and Garden (Clojure). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, W3M should be more popular than Garden (Clojure). It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

W3M mentions (10)

  • dnf update is downloading ImageMagick?
    [code]Installed Packages Name : w3m-img Version : 0.5.3 Release : 57.git20220429.fc37 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 32 k Source : w3m-0.5.3-57.git20220429.fc37.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo : fedora Summary : Helper program to display the inline images for w3m URL : http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ License : MIT and UCD Description : w3m-img package... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Setting up lynx
    You should check w3m http://w3m.sourceforge.net/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • The sad truth
    Try http://w3m.sourceforge.net some day. :). Source: about 3 years ago
  • w3m rocks
    Does anyone have a chart/rundown of why we should choose links/lynx/w3m? The old main page calls links / lynx "neighbors"... http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ I use links (gentoo user here), but I do not really see a huge difference between the three. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Is Firefox the only alternative to all the chromium-based browsers?
    Lynx is pretty good, but I personally like w3m. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing W3M and Garden (Clojure), you can also consider the following products

Lynx.invisible-island.net - Thomas Dickey is the maintainer/developer of the Lynx text-browser. This page gives some background and pointers to Lynx resources.

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

Browsh - A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

Links - Links is a graphics and text mode web browser, released under GPL. Links is free software.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.