Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

w2ui VS FeathersJS

Compare w2ui VS FeathersJS and see what are their differences

w2ui logo w2ui

W2UI is a small JavaScript UI library with a complete set of widgets: layout, grid, sidebar, toolbar, tabs, fields, popup, utilities.

FeathersJS logo FeathersJS

Wow your users. Build incredible real-time applications in record time.
  • w2ui Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-01
  • FeathersJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17

w2ui features and specs

  • Comprehensive UI Components
    W2UI offers a complete set of UI widgets such as grids, forms, toolbars, and more, providing a full suite for web application development.
  • Lightweight
    The library is only around 100 KB in size, which makes it lightweight and fast to load, providing better performance and quicker page loads.
  • Pure JavaScript
    W2UI is written in pure JavaScript without external dependencies like jQuery, which reduces external dependency issues.
  • Rich Features
    Includes many advanced features such as inline editing in Grids, keyboard shortcuts, and advanced filtering capabilities.
  • Responsive Design
    The library supports responsive design, making it suitable for creating applications that work across different devices and screen sizes.

Possible disadvantages of w2ui

  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like React or Angular, W2UI has a smaller community, which means fewer tutorials, plugins, and community support.
  • Complexity for Dynamic Updates
    Handling dynamically updated data can be complex, as W2UI may require more manual manipulation to update the UI as compared to frameworks with virtual DOMs.
  • Learning Curve
    New developers might face a learning curve due to the extensive set of features, especially those unfamiliar with working directly with JavaScript-based UI libraries.
  • Browser Compatibility
    While generally compatible with modern browsers, some older browsers may not fully support all features of W2UI, requiring additional workarounds.
  • Limited Third-party Integrations
    W2UI lacks ecosystem integrations found in larger frameworks or libraries, which may require additional effort when integrating with other tools or libraries.

FeathersJS features and specs

  • Real-Time Functionality
    FeathersJS makes it easy to create real-time applications with WebSocket and RESTful APIs. It supports real-time data synchronization, which can be especially useful for interactive applications.
  • Flexibility
    FeathersJS is designed to work seamlessly with a variety of databases and frontend frameworks. This makes it highly flexible for different project requirements.
  • Microservice Ready
    FeathersJS supports modular architecture, which is well-suited for building microservices. Services can be easily scaled and managed independently.
  • Ease of Use
    The framework is designed to be intuitive and easy to use, even for developers who may not have extensive experience with Node.js. It includes built-in authentication and other common features.
  • Extensible
    FeathersJS has a rich ecosystem of plugins and hooks, allowing developers to extend functionality without modifying the core codebase.
  • Good Documentation
    FeathersJS provides well-written and comprehensive documentation, which makes it easier for new developers to get started and for experienced developers to find advanced features.

Possible disadvantages of FeathersJS

  • Limited Community
    Compared to more popular frameworks like Express or Koa, the FeathersJS community is smaller, which may result in fewer third-party resources and community support.
  • Learning Curve
    While FeathersJS is designed to be easy to use, its concepts and architecture can be different from other Node.js frameworks, which may require some time to learn.
  • Middleware Complexity
    FeathersJS uses a special middleware structure that might be complex for developers who are used to traditional middleware in Express.js.
  • Performance
    Although FeathersJS is generally performant, it might not be as fast as some lower-level frameworks, especially when dealing with very high volumes of traffic.
  • Dependency on JSON Schema
    FeathersJS heavily relies on JSON Schema for data validation, which can add complexity and may not be suitable for all applications.
  • Limited Middleware
    The middleware ecosystem is not as extensive as some other Node.js frameworks, which might necessitate custom middleware development for certain use cases.

w2ui videos

No w2ui videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

FeathersJS videos

OSS 2019: FeathersJS with David Lueke

More videos:

  • Review - ❄️ Chill Stream | Building EntropyChat.app | node.js, FeathersJS, Vue.js, Vuex, Electron

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to w2ui and FeathersJS)
Javascript UI Libraries
72 72%
28% 28
JavaScript Framework
39 39%
61% 61
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using w2ui and FeathersJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FeathersJS seems to be a lot more popular than w2ui. While we know about 39 links to FeathersJS, we've tracked only 1 mention of w2ui. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

w2ui mentions (1)

  • [AskJS] Tabulator takes 150mb to render 25k rows. Is this normal?
    Use https://w2ui.com/web/ , which literally uses a few mb's to render 27k records from Array. What a beast! Tested it with 250k ~ 50mb. This will do ... Source: almost 2 years ago

FeathersJS mentions (39)

  • Show HN: Triplit – Open-source syncing database that runs on server and client
    This is just using sqlite under the hood and none of this will scale. Why build your own query builder as well when you could just hook in one of the many ORMs in the NPM ecosystem and add support for 50+ other databases. This also isn't really something you could drop into an existing project very easily. Overall, I'm not impressed. Here are some other options I prefer: https://feathersjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Ask HN: Can anyone suggest few open source projects for SaaS Boilerplate?
    For backend this might help https://feathersjs.com. I’m not affiliated with them, just a happy user. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Best NodeJS frameworks for seamless backend development
    Feathers.js is a web framework built on top of Express which provides a simple way to develop a scalable and reliable application. Feathers.js supports many databases and works with any frontend technology including iOS, Android, and React Native. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Choosing a backend API framework
    Feathers.js - fully fledged backend framework, with almost anything out of the box. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Node.js 20 is now available
    For anything CRUD or that can be modeled as such, I use FeathersJS (https://feathersjs.com/). - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing w2ui and FeathersJS, you can also consider the following products

Webix UI - An enterprise JavaScript Library for cross-platform app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets and easy integration with most popular JavaScript Frameworks.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

Inferno - An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.

Koa.js - Next generation web framework for node.js

Deku - Functional view library for building UI components as an alternative to React

Nest.js - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, reliable and scalable server-side applications.