VSTS VS Gitless

Protip: Use a debugger like dnSpy or Visual studio to trace the source of error, by stepping the program line by line. You can restart with dnSpy attached. Source: 5 months ago

Go ahead and initialise our new project using the CodePen playground or setup your own project on Visual Studio Code with the following file structure under your src folder. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

> You don’t believe me yet? Just look at the VisualStudio home page: (https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/) The author is trying to pull the wool over his readers' eyes. This is NOT the main landing page for either VSCode or VisualStudio. Those are https://code.visualstudio.com/ and https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/vs/, respectively. Copilot doesn't make any sort of appearance on either page.. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

An example from a past job - it was decided (and rightfully so) that performance of a developer tool was the main cause of dissatisfaction for enterprise customers and would risk our business. And so my slice of this was for a system called the "project system", which is sort of like a miniature resource management component of an operating system, but inside of a big developer tool. It loaded codebase context and... Source: 11 months ago

This is the subreddit for Visual Studio, which isn't the same as Visual Studio Code. You want /r/vscode. Source: 12 months ago

One such project is the Gitless initiative which has a Python wrapper around Git proper providing far-simpler workflows based on some solid research. Unfortunately it doesn't look like Gitless' Python codebase has had active development recently, which doesn't inspire much confidence. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

You and me both. Git's interface has been very hard for me to understand (especially coming from Mercurial). I ended up finding Gitless (https://gitless.com), a wrapper around Git with a better interface, and loving it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

> > To differentiate from Git Pijul should focus on usability... If Pijul has an easy to use interface like Mercurial did then that will massively help adoption. > I don't think the goal or differentiation of pijul is to be popular via good UI, though. If the theory of patches is good, it doesn't matter if pijul "wins" or not, as long as whatever does can integrate it. If the theory of patches is bad, I... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I'd like to think it was my project (https://github.com/martinvonz/jj), but other possibilities include Gitless (https://gitless.com/) or Bazaar (https://bazaar.canonical.com/). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Gitless [1] has already been mentioned in another comment here. [2] That makes it easier to use hit for those who are not as experienced or haven’t learned about the internals of git. For a different model (and other types of workflows), consider Fossil SCM. [3] Here’s a comparison of fossil with git, and what these tools are a good fit for. [4] I found fossil easier to understand, relatively speaking, and it... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago