Based on our record, Visual Studio Code seems to be a lot more popular than Reviewable. While we know about 1032 links to Visual Studio Code, we've tracked only 21 mentions of Reviewable. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
When working in Visual Studio Code (VS Code), always create a new Python file for your project. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
So, to view a live preview of your local website or project on the phone, ensure your phone and desktop are connected to the same WiFi network. After this, install VS Code Editor if you don’t have and Live Server extension. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
If you haven't already installed VSCode, you can download it from the official website. Follow the installation instructions for your operating system. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
So, after a few seconds, your project will be ready and I would love if you open the project on some code editor. I'll be using Visual Studio Code. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
Additionally, if you're using an advanced Integrated Development Environment (IDE) like Visual Studio Code (VSCode), you can directly use iOS or Android emulators through the IDE. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
Reviewable.io — Code review for GitHub repositories, free for public or personal repos. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Yep, I agree! I work at, and use, Reviewable (https://reviewable.io) and we're the best way to review code on GitHub because we've focused on making the whole process better at every step. We've improved diffing, not only for large files (we support larger files than GitHub does) but also for understanding that diff. Have you ever reviewed a PR twice, but the second time around all your comments are gone and you... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Https://reviewable.io is the earliest full-powered Critique alternative for GitHub. It supports some cool things Critique doesn't/didn't, such as reviewing multi-commit branches (also across history-rewriting force-push cleanups), and indicating exactly the nature of your comment (just FYI, or you want this to be changed before you'll give your approval). (I was an intern in the initial making of Critique, and... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
The linux kernel, which is open source and does want contributors, is doing more-or-less just fine with an email-based PR and review flow. If it's an open source project, it should be using an open source review platform that allows improvements and specialization of the code hosting too. Using github, where the review tools are bad and can't be improved by an outsider, is a slap in the face to open source.... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
>See reviewer presence so that you can see if someone is already reviewing and avoid unnecessary pings. >Visibly values privacy and security above all else These two things seem squarely at odds. Personally, I don't want my code review tool announcing to developers when I'm looking at their PR. The fact that it's a Chrome extension would also be a big blocker for me. I run a dev team, and I wouldn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.
Gerrit Code Review - OpenSource Git Code Review Tool
Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing
Phabricator - Phacility - Phabricator
Notepad++ - A free source code editor which supports several programming languages running under the MS Windows environment.
Review Board - Stress-free code review for teams of all sizes