Vaadin Framework Reviews

OpenSilver Reviews

Vaadin Framework mentions (35)

• The Adventures of Blink #24: Javascript? Ain't Nobody Got Time Fo Dat

  When I first encountered Vaadin, it really intrigued me. It's always bothered me that for a Java programmer to make an app based in the browser, they had to learn HTML and Javascript to actually finish the project. Why the heck couldn't we just do it all in a single language? Why all this front-end voodoo? - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago

• My opinion on the Tauri framework

  I've always liked GUI, both desktop-based and browser-based before you needed five years of training on the latter. That's the reason I loved, and still love Vaadin: you can develop web UIs without writing a single line of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS. I'm still interested in the subject; a couple of years ago, I analyzed the state of JVM desktop frameworks. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Vaadin — Build scalable UIs in Java or TypeScript, and use the integrated tooling, components, and design system to iterate faster, design better, and simplify the development process. Unlimited Projects with five years of free maintenance. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• The conjunction of the web

  But how do we explain the complexity of the current toolset? This is where the Law of the instrument kicks in: "If the only tool you have is a hammer, it is tempting to treat everything as if it were a nail.". Even if JavaScript was born in the web, JavaScript centered frameworks do not fit properly in the web. That is why we have huge bundles of JavaScript, that is why RSC are necessary (things like RSC were... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago

• Ask HN: Why is web development such a daunting task?

  Skip javascript entirely. Pynecone (https://pynecone.io/), Vaadin (https://vaadin.com/), Buffalo (https://github.com/gobuffalo/buffalo) all exist and can help you avoid some of the mess that is web/JS development. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

OpenSilver mentions (11)

• Revisiting WASM for F#

  I would also say that IF blazor worked on a browser plugin like silverlight did, today that's not the case it is built on the webassembly standard which and it is being adopted in the browsers which means once it gets on the web, it is unlikely to ever go out again. Even if Microsoft themselves leave Blazor today, it can still work, the burden of creating a fork and keeping blazor alive will certainly be big but... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Seeking Advice on Product Positioning for new .NET-based SDK/Framework

  Under the Hood: Technically, XR# integrates Three.js, A-Frame.js, and the Microsoft .NET to WASM compiler (like in Blazor). It’s built on our decade-long experience with OpenSilver, a contemporary Silverlight alternative. Source: 9 months ago

• WASI: A New Kind of System Interface

  Nah, I appreciate the wonderfull work of those WebAssembly people that allowed me to have Java applets, Flash and Silverligh running again in the browser. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpj/ https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/ https://opensilver.net/ Thanks for making the revenge of plugins a reality. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• 20 Years of .NET

  Now there is a company making Silverlight work on top of WebAssembly. https://opensilver.net/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Prime Video Uses WebAssembly

  It will definitly be the new common, by killing Flash et all without comparable tooling, while at the same time offering WASM, it was only a matter of time until we had the revenge of plugins. Basically 10 years wasting time to come full circle. https://leaningtech.com/cheerpj https://leaningtech.com/cheerpx-for-flash/ https://opensilver.net/ All of the three major ones are now back, but it is ok, WASM is great! - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago