USA TODAY VS The Factual

Which is odd, usually places actually post the response not just that someone refused. Does that mean it just didn't respond? It's really just pinknews and a weird usatoday.news site instead of the real usatoday.com site where I can find this after searching, and some twitter users linking it. Source: over 1 year ago

John Mueller from Google said they are. There was a Search Engine Journal article where he said they are able to catch most of them and make them not worth anything. We have tried web 2.0 vs standard link building and we noticed that Google does devalue a lot of web 2.0 links. We had a site with 1000 links and another with 13000 in the same niche but the 13000 was web 2.0 and the site with 1000 ranks higher on... Source: over 1 year ago

No source from usatoday.com actually proves any of this.... Nothing has been updated since she assumed office in 2019. This sub blows my mind. You all talk about how stupid any other sub is but just chew on and push anything that fits you. I can stop shaking my head at both sides and the amount of bullshit everyone just takes as facts. Source: over 1 year ago

App / URL: cnn.com, msn.com, usatoday.com (just these three to test, blocking obvious sections games, esports, mail, sports, etc). Source: almost 2 years ago

Hi everyone: That’s all I have time to answer today. Thank you for all the questions. Keep following our coverage at usatoday.com and email me with tips, questions etc at jmeyer@usatoday.com. Source: about 2 years ago

From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago

According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago

We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: over 2 years ago

> Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: about 3 years ago