Undertow VS HTTP

Compare Undertow VS HTTP and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Undertow

Undertow is a webserver written in Java, providing both blocking and non-blocking API’s based on NIO.

HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

Landing page //
2019-09-10

Landing page //
2022-12-21

Too Many Bones Undertow - Overview and Review

HTTP videos

No HTTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Undertow and HTTP)

HTTP

Web And Application Servers

54 54%

Web And Application Servers

46% 46

Application Server

59 59%

Application Server

41% 41

Web Servers

55 55%

Web Servers

45% 45

Development Tools

50 50%

Development Tools

50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Undertow and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Undertow mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Undertow yet. Tracking of Undertow recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HTTP mentions (7)

Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago
HTTP Protocol Overview
The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago