Umso VS mozjpeg

Umso Reviews

mozjpeg Reviews

Umso mentions (3)

• Tools I used to scale a lawncare SMB to $40k/mo with around 40% profits

  Umso.com - to create a landing page that everyone on the team could quickly edit. Source: about 1 year ago

• MicroSaaS - a way to wealth for builders and hustlers

  Notion.so is a tool that helps manage projects and all that good stuff. Many people plan their website content on Notion for their new website or landing page. Then one day, one guy, how's about building a tool that takes that content and turns into a website quickly. BOOM -> potion.so was born. This tool solves a few sound problems: simple to spin up a website through Notion without spending extra effort and... Source: over 2 years ago

• Advice for Saas development

  First up - inspite of you getting positive feedback for the idea from your connections, put together a concept page using any of the template based site builders like a umso.com, webflow.com etc. And run a simple experiment to see how many of your target audience signs up to get an early bird access to your biz/product. You can also use this to build your initial subscriber/mailing list. Source: over 2 years ago

mozjpeg mentions (13)

• It's the future – you can stop using JPEGs

  It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Random Code Inspiration Volume 2

  Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

• JPEG XL: How It Started, How It’s Going

  > MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Why there may never be a libjpeg-turbo 3.1

  FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Are all JPEG compression implementations the same?

  No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago