UIKit VS Blazor

Compare UIKit VS Blazor and see what are their differences

IsDown.app

Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

UIKit

A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces

Blazor

An experimental web UI framework using C#/Razor and HTML, running in the browser via WebAssembly

Landing page //
2023-07-24

Landing page //
2023-10-19

UIKit

Website: getuikit.com
$ Details

Edit details

Blazor

Website: blazor.net
$ Details: -

Edit details

UIKit features and specs

Modularity
UIKit is highly modular, allowing developers to include only the components they need. This can lead to more efficient and faster loading webpages.
Extensive Documentation
The framework comes with extensive and well-detailed documentation, making it easier for developers to get started and effectively utilize components.
Responsive Design
UIKit is designed with responsiveness in mind, offering a sleek user experience across different screen sizes and devices.
Customization
UIKit allows for deep customization through its LESS and SCSS files, enabling developers to modify the framework according to their needs.
Active Community
There is an active community which leads to consistent updates and a wealth of shared resources and plugins.

Possible disadvantages of UIKit

Learning Curve
For beginners, UIKit can be complex and might require a learning curve to become proficient in its use.
Limited Third-Party Integrations
Compared to more mature frameworks like Bootstrap, UIKit may offer fewer third-party integrations and plugins.
Potential Overhead
Including too many unnecessary components can add to the overhead, resulting in slower load times if not managed properly.
Inconsistencies Across Browsers
Occasional inconsistencies may be noted across different browsers, which may require additional effort to resolve.
Less Recognition
UIKit is not as commonly recognized as some other frameworks, which may lead to challenges in finding developers experienced with it.

Blazor features and specs

Single Language
Blazor allows developers to use C# for both client-side and server-side development, reducing the need to switch between different languages and enhancing developer productivity.
Full-Stack Development
With Blazor, developers can build full-stack web applications using .NET, leveraging the vast .NET ecosystem and tools.
WebAssembly Support
Blazor WebAssembly enables running C# code directly in the browser, allowing for rich interactive web applications with less reliance on JavaScript.
Reusability
Blazor promotes code reusability by allowing shared code between server and client-side applications.
Components-Based Architecture
It uses a component-based architecture that facilitates easier maintenance of code and enhances modularity.

Possible disadvantages of Blazor

Performance Limits
Blazor WebAssembly can have slower performance compared to JavaScript due to its intermediated execution through WebAssembly.
Download Size
Blazor WebAssembly applications can have larger initial download sizes, which can affect load times and user experience.
Newness
As a relatively new technology, the Blazor community is still growing, which can sometimes limit the availability of third-party tools and resources.
Limited Browser Support
Some older browsers do not support WebAssembly, potentially reducing the reach of Blazor applications if not accounted for.
Learning Curve
Developers familiar with JavaScript frameworks may encounter a learning curve when transitioning to Blazor and the .NET ecosystem.

Analysis of UIKit

Overall verdict

Yes, UIKit is considered a good choice for web developers looking to build modern, responsive, and aesthetically pleasing applications with a focus on customization and modularity.

Why this product is good

UIKit is a front-end framework that is well-regarded for its modularity, flexibility, and comprehensive set of components. It offers a consistent and clean design system, making it easy for developers to build responsive and engaging web interfaces. Additionally, UIKit provides customization options that allow developers to create unique designs while maintaining a cohesive look and feel. The framework includes a comprehensive documentation, which helps in ease of use and implementation.

Recommended for

UIKit is recommended for developers who need a flexible and modular framework for building user interfaces, especially those who prefer a clean design system and extensive component library. It is suitable for beginners due to its comprehensible documentation and also for experienced developers looking to streamline their workflow with a reliable front-end framework.

UIKit videos

+ Add

Should I Learn SwiftUI instead of UIKit?

Blazor videos

+ Add

Is Blazor A JavaScript Killer?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UIKit and Blazor)

UIKit

Blazor

Design Tools

100 100%

Design Tools

0% 0

Developer Tools

85 85%

Developer Tools

15% 15

CSS Framework

100 100%

CSS Framework

0% 0

Web Frameworks

0 0%

Web Frameworks

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using UIKit and Blazor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UIKit and Blazor

UIKit Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For

UIkit includes an extensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components, all easy to use and customizable. Features include a responsive grid system, navigation components, form elements, and more. Though UIkit does not offer explicit integrations, its modular nature means it can be easily incorporated into many different web development workflows and tools.

Source: thectoclub.com

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024

One of the advantages of UIKit is that it offers a wide range of UI components, even more than Bootstrap. It also includes unique components like Totop, Thumbnav, and more. Considering its rich set of resources, UIKit can be regarded as an ideal alternative to Bootstrap.

Source: coursesity.com

Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022

UI Kit has a comprehensive collection of CSS, HTML, and JS components. It is modular and lightweight. Used for iOS application development, UIKit is one of the bestfront-end CSS frameworks.

Source: hackr.io

10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives

UIKit offers an easy approach to developing sophisticated web interfaces. It’s a modular front-end framework that can be used with HTML or JavaScript. With this structure, you may quickly create your web layouts with ease. This structure is perfect for laying out your website. When compared to Bootstrap, this framework offers more UI components. It also includes oddity parts...

Source: thetechhacker.com

Best CSS Frameworks in 2019

Our fourth framework to consider is UIkit. UIkit is “a lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces” (UIkit). The framework comes with built-in animations, is customizable and has out-of-the-box designs.

Source: www.codeauthority.com

Blazor Reviews

Exploring 15 Powerful Flutter Alternatives

One advantage Blazor introduces comes around security-sensitive use cases. With .NET powering backend, client, and shared application logic, Blazor simplifies applying consistent security principles systemwide. The robust .NET encryption libraries integrate cleanly to protect network and device data. Single unified user authentication flows minimize risk exposure through...

Source: positiwise.medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UIKit should be more popular than Blazor. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UIKit mentions (22)

100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
UIkit: A lightweight and modular front-end framework. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Building UIs with Franken UI, a Shadcn alternative
Franken UI is compatible with UIkit 3 and can work as a standalone CSS framework but can be integrated with Tailwind CSS for faster styling and customization. The design of Franken UI is influenced by shadcn/ui. It aims to provide a solution to developers who are not comfortable using React, Vue, or Svelte by leveraging UIkit for JavaScript and accessibility. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
SwiftUI vs. UIKit: What is the best choice for building an iOS user interface in 2024?
As an iOS engineer, you've likely encountered SwiftUI and UIkit, two popular tools for building iOS user interfaces. SwiftUI is the new cool kid on the block, providing a clean way to build iOS screens, while UIkit is the older and more traditional way to build screens for iOS. SwiftUI uses a declarative style where you describe how the UI should look, similar to Jetpack Compose in Android. UIkit, on the other... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
How To Build a Web Application with HTMX and Go
All that's left is adding a little style. I won't claim to be a frontend engineer or a UI designer, so I just used UIKit to easily add modern-looking style to the HTML table and buttons. As mentioned throughout the article, the CSS classes and other small details are excluded since they are not directly relevant to the tutorial. See the full example on GitHub to try running it for yourself. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
On the search for a truly "good" UI framework.
Can try UIKIT out if you're looking around, I've used it solely for some quick slider stuff in certain projects and use it fully in others. The docs are pretty good and they have a discord community that's fairly active. Source: almost 2 years ago

Blazor mentions (7)

Blazor and .NET 8: How I Built a Fast and Flexible Website
I’ve been working on a new website for my series CSharp in the Cards. I built this website in a way that was easy to maintain, flexible and most importantly would respond quickly to requests from visitors. I knew that Blazor with .NET 8 had a static server rendering feature and decided that I wanted to put it to the test. I recently published a new lesson to the website and included a web assembly component to... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
#12: Headless CMS & SWA - Built With Blazor
Over the last few days we've been exploring JavaScript-based frameworks for building web apps. Today, we switch our attention to our amazing .NET community and talk about building Static Web Apps with Blazor. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
What is a good reason to consider Blazor?
Hi there. I'm the Program Manager at Microsoft for Blazor, so naturally I'm happy to make the Blazor pitch 😊. If you're comfortable already with JS/TS then it's understandable that Blazor might not have as strong an appeal. Blazor is all about enabling full stack web development with just .NET & C# without having to write JavaScript. But even if you are a JS/TS fan, it's still very convenient to operate fully... Source: over 3 years ago
My Favorite C# Features - Part 5: Build for the Modern Web with Blazor
Building web applications with Blazor is a great way for developers who enjoy C# and .NET to create interactive web applications. I encourage you to check out the Blazor 101 video series published on YouTube and check out https://blazor.net for more learning materials and the tools to get started with Blazor. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
What to Expect in .NET 6
Blazor has become a smart way to build .NET web applications. This is because of its seamlessness and ease of integration with UI libraries like ComponentOne. This makes the application development life cycle more efficient. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago