Ubuntu Software Center VS bauh

Ubuntu Software Center

The Ubuntu Software Centre gives you instant access to thousands of free and open-source...

bauh (ba-oo), formerly known as fpakman, is a graphical interface for managing your Linux software (packages/applications). It currently supports the following formats: AppImage, ArchLinux repositories/AUR, Flatpak, Snap and Web applications.

Landing page //
2023-09-17

Landing page //
2023-10-07

Make Ubuntu Software Center Faster.

bauh videos

+ Add

Review Bauh semangka 🍉 || Kebun Buah Segar

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ubuntu Software Center and bauh)

Ubuntu Software Center

bauh

Package Manager

100 100%

Package Manager

0% 0

Front End Package Manager

44 44%

Front End Package Manager

56% 56

Windows Tools

100 100%

Windows Tools

0% 0

Software Marketplace

28 28%

Software Marketplace

72% 72

User comments

Share your experience with using Ubuntu Software Center and bauh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bauh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ubuntu Software Center mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ubuntu Software Center yet. Tracking of Ubuntu Software Center recommendations started around Mar 2021.

bauh mentions (12)

Imade a simple shell script program to manage packages in Linux. Currently it supports apt, flatpak, snap. It can probably be useful for someone.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. Source: 12 months ago
Problems installing many apps
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands. Source: over 1 year ago
Name a program that doesn't get enough love!
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists. Source: over 1 year ago
BalenaEtcher appimage is not clickable?
Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead. Source: over 1 year ago
Boutique: a Flatpak app store (alpha) feedbacks are welcome
You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub. Source: almost 2 years ago