bauh VS AppImagePool

Compare bauh VS AppImagePool and see what are their differences

BoxyHQ

B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more! featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

bauh

bauh (ba-oo), formerly known as fpakman, is a graphical interface for managing your Linux software (packages/applications). It currently supports the following formats: AppImage, ArchLinux repositories/AUR, Flatpak, Snap and Web applications.

AppImagePool

A simple, modern AppImageHub Client made for linux using flutter.

Landing page //
2023-10-07

Landing page //
2021-08-23

Review Bauh semangka 🍉 || Kebun Buah Segar

AppImagePool videos

+ Add

Como instalar y usar AppImagePool - Tienda de software en este formato

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bauh and AppImagePool)

bauh

AppImagePool

Front End Package Manager

50 50%

Front End Package Manager

50% 50

Software Marketplace

53 53%

Software Marketplace

47% 47

Work Music

100 100%

Work Music

0% 0

Package Manager

31 31%

Package Manager

69% 69

User comments

Share your experience with using bauh and AppImagePool. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bauh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bauh mentions (12)

Imade a simple shell script program to manage packages in Linux. Currently it supports apt, flatpak, snap. It can probably be useful for someone.
Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. Source: 11 months ago
Problems installing many apps
If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands. Source: over 1 year ago
Name a program that doesn't get enough love!
Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists. Source: over 1 year ago
BalenaEtcher appimage is not clickable?
Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead. Source: over 1 year ago
Boutique: a Flatpak app store (alpha) feedbacks are welcome
You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub. Source: almost 2 years ago