Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Tux Commander VS fman

Compare Tux Commander VS fman and see what are their differences

Tux Commander logo Tux Commander

Tux Commander Homepage, an opensource GTK2 file manager

fman logo fman

An unexpected gift. January 07, 2018 by Michael. One of the nice things that happened last week was an fman user writing in to say that 1) fman "is THE BEST SOFTWARE" (sic). And that 2) he would like to send me a $50 tip.
  • Tux Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-28
  • fman Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21

Tux Commander features and specs

  • Open Source
    Tux Commander is free to use and modify, allowing users access to its source code, which promotes transparency and community-driven improvements.
  • Dual Panel Interface
    It features a dual-panel interface that enhances file management efficiency by allowing users to view and manage files from two folders simultaneously.
  • Plugin Support
    Its architecture supports plugins which extend its functionality, making it adaptable to different user needs.
  • Lightweight
    Tux Commander is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on less powerful hardware.
  • Familiar GUI
    The graphical user interface is intuitive and similar to other file managers, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of Tux Commander

  • Limited Development
    The software has seen slower development progress in recent years, which may lead to issues with compatibility with newer systems or lack of new features.
  • Linux Exclusive
    Tux Commander is designed specifically for Linux, limiting its availability and usefulness on other operating systems like Windows or macOS.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to some modern file managers, it lacks advanced features such as integrated cloud storage support and advanced search functionalities.
  • Potentially Outdated Interface
    Its user interface may feel dated compared to more modern file management solutions, which could affect user experience.

fman features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Availability
    fman is available on macOS, Windows, and Linux, allowing users to have a consistent file management experience across different operating systems.
  • Performance
    fman is built to be lightweight and fast, which can result in quicker file operations and a more responsive interface compared to some other file managers.
  • Plugin System
    fman offers a plugin system that allows users to extend its functionality according to their needs, which fosters a customizable experience.
  • Dual-Pane Interface
    The dual-pane interface is highly efficient for tasks that involve moving or copying files between directories, offering a productivity boost for power users.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Extensive keyboard shortcut support lets advanced users perform operations quickly without needing to use the mouse, speeding up file management tasks.

Possible disadvantages of fman

  • Paid Software
    fman is not free; it requires a purchase for continuous use, which might be a drawback for users looking for a free alternative.
  • Limited Built-In Features
    Out-of-the-box, fman might lack some advanced features found in other file managers, requiring users to install plugins to achieve the same functionality.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a learning curve when adapting to fman's interface and keyboard shortcuts, especially if they are coming from more traditional file managers.
  • Plugin Management
    While the plugin system is a pro, managing and finding the right plugins can be cumbersome for some users. Additionally, community plugins might vary in quality.
  • UI Design
    Some users might find the minimalist design too simplistic compared to other file managers, potentially missing out on a richer, more feature-complete interface.

Analysis of fman

Overall verdict

  • fman is a solid choice for users seeking a customizable and efficient file management solution. However, those who prefer a more graphical interface with advanced features out-of-the-box may need to look at alternative solutions.

Why this product is good

  • fman is a dual-pane file manager designed to enhance productivity by allowing users to efficiently organize and manage their files across different platforms. It is especially appreciated for its extensibility, as users can create or download plugins to tailor the software to their specific needs. Additionally, its minimalistic design and multi-platform support make it an appealing choice for those who frequently switch between operating systems.

Recommended for

  • Developers and IT professionals who require a cross-platform file manager.
  • Users who appreciate customizability through plugins.
  • Individuals looking for a lightweight and speed-oriented file manager.

Tux Commander videos

No Tux Commander videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

fman videos

Speargun trigger review @ trigger panah ikan #FMAN

More videos:

  • Review - Introducing the OwnHammer 412 FMAN 6-pack
  • Review - Releasing fman 0 6 3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tux Commander and fman)
FTP Client
11 11%
89% 89
File Manager
10 10%
90% 90
File Explorer
100 100%
0% 0
File Management
11 11%
89% 89

User comments

Share your experience with using Tux Commander and fman. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Tux Commander and fman

Tux Commander Reviews

We have no reviews of Tux Commander yet.
Be the first one to post

fman Reviews

14 Alternative File Managers To Replace Windows 10 File Explorer
A very simple dual-window view file manager. The only extra feature I saw was the search bar at the top that you can use to quickly access anything. However, it’s also really small in size and light on resources, so try fman if you have a slow PC.
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fman should be more popular than Tux Commander. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tux Commander mentions (1)

  • One Commander – a new Windows 10 file browser
    If you want OSS alternatives for Linux, here are some. A few may look old and unpolished, but today pretty much every desktop environment comes with its own file manager. https://www.4pane.co.uk/ https://doublecmd.sourceforge.io/ https://ignorantguru.github.io/spacefm/ http://tuxcmd.sourceforge.net/ http://www.boomerangsworld.de/cms/worker/ http://roland65.free.fr/xfe/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

fman mentions (10)

  • Ask HN: What project do you donate to?
    My first donations were for daily-driver productivity tools: Min browser (https://github.com/minbrowser/min). - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago
  • File Pilot: A file explorer built for speed with a modern, robust interface
    I once devoted 2 years of my life to developing a file manager called fman [1]. In total, it generated probably 35,000$ in profits, so my income from the project is somewhere under 10 $/h. As software developers, our opportunity costs are high. I use my file manager to this day and love it - how could I not. But I regret spending so much time on it. Congratulations on your launch. I wish you more success than I've... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Use Midnight Commander like a pro (2015)
    Shameless plug for my more modern alternative to Midnight Commander, https://fman.io. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Best symbols in folder names to pin an important folder up top?
    Use a file browser that supports jumping to a folder by frecency (examples: z (shell extension) or my-dired-recent-dirs() in my dired or https://fman.io/ for users that prefer graphical UIs). You will find out that you will prefer jumping to navigation when you're familiar with the concept. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: Why aren't there any real alternatives to Electron?
    There are great alternatives. I used Python and Qt to create my file manager [1]. It's a tool that needs to start quickly so Electron was not an option [2]. I open sourced my build system for creating cross-platform desktop apps with it in minutes at https://build-system.fman.io/. 1: https://fman.io 2: https://fman.io/blog/picking-technologies-for-a-desktop-app-in-2016/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tux Commander and fman, you can also consider the following products

FTP Synchronizer - Secure and high performance FTP File Sync product

Midnight Commander - GNU Midnight Commander is a visual file manager, licensed under GNU General Public License and...

GNOME Commander - GNOME Commander is a "two-pane" graphical file manager for the GNOME desktop environment.

Double Commander - Double Commander is a cross-platform open source file manager with two panels side by side.

Polo File Manager - Software for Linux

Vifm - Vifm is a ncurses based file manager with vi like keybindings.